James O’Connor in 1978 (photo courtesy
of the UC-Santa Cruz Digital Collections)
Sadly, James
O’Connor, the American ecosocialist, died in November last year. He was an important figure in ecosocialist
tradition. There are threads of the philosophy going back to Murray Bookchin in the
1960s and William Morris in the nineteenth century, and much further back in
history. But O’Connor who emerged in the early 1980s as one of the first
writers/thinkers to self-consciously consider themselves to be ecosocialist from a philosophical standpoint, and start to build a movement to make the theory a reality.
He developed the thesis of the second contradiction of capitalism, that is, it degrades the thing that it needs to sustain economic growth, the environment.
He developed the thesis of the second contradiction of capitalism, that is, it degrades the thing that it needs to sustain economic growth, the environment.
Written by Salvatore
Engel Di Mauro and first published at Entitle
Blog as part of a series of reflections.
We mourn the sudden loss of a visionary and highly influential thinker, James Richard O’Connor, co-founder with Barbara Laurence of Capitalism Nature Socialism and the Center for Political Ecology. O’Connor was a rigorous, indefatigable intellectual and a committed Polanyian Marxist activist. His thoughts have reached and shaped the minds of thousands of people, including mine, and I trust thousands more will benefit from his insights.
He wrote on a
wide range of subjects of great political consequence and of continuing
currency and urgency. This includes explaining, in his early works, the
relationship between capitalism and the state, as well as clarifying linkages
between imperialism and economic processes. The Fiscal Crisis of the State is
but one of the better known of his writings that emerged from this line of
research. It remains a classical piece, and one that should be read even more
widely and translated into more languages than it is.
O’Connor also
contributed to great theoretical strides for all of us in CNS through his
latter endeavors on the ecological crisis, especially in the late 1980s. This,
to me, is the germinal intellectual turning point that oversaw, with the
establishment of this journal, the confluence of left-leaning ecological thought
with a diversity of leftist anti-capitalist approaches, including variants of
Marxism and feminism.
The creative
and illuminating outcomes of this confluence and, to a larger extent,
interweaving of disparate currents are among the lasting legacies bequeathed to
us through O’Connor’s efforts. The development of his Second Contradiction
thesis is but one shining example of what came about through such confluence of
approaches, and it continues to be an inspiration (or source of debate) for
many.
O’Connor’s
formidable intellect was complemented by political commitment. This was
reflected in, among other actions, his involvement in local environmental
struggles. Part of this kind of activity was consumed by writing pamphlets
accessible to a wide readership, including for the Students for Democratic
Society’s educational campaigns in the 1970s and for various environmental and
social policy activist groups in the 1980s.
His political
commitment was also represented by his networking and organizing with intellectuals
across continents to bring to the attention of North American audiences news,
perspectives, and analyses of social and environmental struggles from different
parts of the world. He facilitated such international information flow by
creating a network of journals from Catalunya/Spain, Italy, and France, based
on reciprocity and free manuscript exchange. This is one major way in which
this journal came to have international breadth and reach, as well as benefit
from the input of thinkers from many countries.
James
O’Connor struggled in an inimical intellectual world to keep Marxist
perspectives alive while critically reconstructing them to overcome their
historical inadequacies, especially with respect to ecology. In all this, he
did not mince words, maintained a clear political line, yet kept this journal
from falling under any particular tendency, including his own. Farewell,
Comrade O’Connor, intrepid navigator of still very rough political waters, and
infinite thanks for your intellectual guidance and inheritance.
No comments:
Post a Comment