Caroline
Lucas, the Green party MP for Brighton Pavilion and co-leader of the party,
revealed her three point plan for the UK to remain in the European Union (EU) writing on politics.co.uk this week. Lucas, a long standing campaigner for
the country to remain in the EU, laments the paucity of the Remain campaign in
the run up to the 2016 referendum on whether or not we should stay in the
organisation..
Too much
reliance was put on people worrying about their finances, if we left the bloc,
and the scare tactics employed by the Remain campaign. This tactic had worked
at the Scottish independence referendum two years earlier, but it didn’t in the
EU referendum.
Lucas says
that the consequences of leaving the EU are only now starting to reveal
themselves, with prices rising and shortages of nurses because EU nationals are
have more or less stopped applying for these jobs. With the Tory government
held hostage to a faction of hard right Brexiteers, hell bent on getting as
complete a break as possible with our erstwhile European partners, and even the
best possible outcome will be a much worse deal than we have now.
This is all
true, but we did vote to leave the EU, although leaving could mean joining the European
Economic Area (EEA), Norway style, or being treated as a ‘third country’ like
Canada. Lucas favours a referendum on the outcome of the negotiations between
our relationship with the EU, or staying in as we are currently. But how is
this to be achieved?
Lucas
suggests a three stage plan. In stage one, the stay in the EU message would be
made by new faces. She is right, I think, that the likes of Tony Blair, George
Osborne and Nick Clegg, have no credibility with the voters, as they are seen
as symbolising the establishment that many people voted against. She also
suggests organising at grass roots level, but this may be easier said than done
on a wide-scale basis.
Stage two ‘must
be a commitment to seriously tackling the underlying issues which fuelled Brexit,’
Lucas says. This is a key point. Yes, immigration played a part in the
motivation of many Leave voters, but it wasn’t the only one. There was also a
‘stick it up the establishment’ attitude, although that should have been
directed at the UK government more than the EU. Lucas goes onto make the
argument of the EU as a limited, but possibly more powerful buttress against
global corporations, who are the real thieves of our democracy. Essentially
though, there needs to be repudiation of, and break with nearly forty years of
neo-liberal ideology.
So far so
good, but stage three looks to be the most problematic of all, getting the
Labour party leadership on board. Lucas suggests that Jeremy Corbyn, the Labour
party leader, should sign up to the Another
Europe is Possible pan
European movement, which seeks to reform the EU, to the benefit of its
citizens, as opposed to global corporations.
The ambiguous
signals about our future relationship with the EU, coming out of the Labour
leadership, must stop insists Lucas, as push comes to shove. Corbyn says we
will not stay in the European single market, once we leave the EU, but Kier
Starmer, the shadow Brexit secretary, has said we will remain in the single
market during a transition phase, ‘for as long as it takes’ to secure a good
future arrangement with the EU. Lucas points out that 78% of Labour supporters
want to remain in the EU. Fudging this issue has worked out quite well for
Labour so far, but I agree with Lucas that they will have to take a side soon.
It is fair
point too, that if we are to remain in the EU, it is essential that Labour
backs the move, to give such a push credibility, and to tie in with part of
stage 1 of this plan, to organise a grass roots movement in support of staying
in the EU. Realistically, only the Labour party can do this on the scale that
is needed.
Lucas cites
the example of the recently formed community campaign unit in the Labour party, and with their
membership numbers and general organisational infrastructure, this could be
made a success of. It is hard to see a grass roots campaign achieving the
critical mass to make it effective without Labour, but will they want to do
this?
That is a
hard question to answer, different people in the Labour party say different things
about Brexit, but as the negative consequences of leaving the EU become
clearer, and perhaps if the public shifts sufficiently in the remain direction, this
may become a logical pathway for Labour to follow.
My feeling is
that there is a long way to go with withdrawal from the EU, and pretty much anything
could happen along the way. I am unconvinced that the EU will reform itself
into the sort of community that Lucas describes, but maybe we should not
discount even that in these volatile times.
The original Green campaign around Brexit was terrible. Lucas needs to widen out her clique of people within The Green Party to include people who aren't as posh as her and Bartley.
ReplyDeleteThe EU is the purveyor of neo-liberal capitalism. Caroline is in a difficult position, she was an MEP for nearly two mandates. She will collect a very nice EU pension. Its very difficult for her to take an objective look at the EU set up, without owning to the reality that the EP is simply a side show, power rest with the EC alongside the European Council, both of whom are in hock to corporate interests. She is wholly wrong about how its an a EU level that we can take on corporate interests. Brussels is the second biggest lobby zone in the world, its fanciful for her to think that is financial and power can be taken on by the EP as most MEP's are part of a nice revolving door system with lobbyists.Moreover, its also difficult for Caroline to be objective as she has to some how talk up the "results" achieved by her and other Green MEP's , when in reality what results are simply marginal and frankly irrelevant. Even on Climate change which is the old chestnut that is used to justify remain, the EU policy can best be described as trying to dry a block of ice with a towel.
ReplyDeleteWe will miss the UK Green Party MEPs after the 29th of March 2019 because they have been doing a great job in trying to reform the EU
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately the City of London and the multinacional corporations that they represent still have too much influence in the EU
Once Brexit is delivered they won't be our problem anymore