It is not just
a lefty like me pondering this matter, the Tories are openly posing this
question themselves. Rumours are circulating that membership has fallen to as
low as 70,000, and this is causing some soul searching in the party. Tory MPs
like Nick Boles and Nicolas Soames, admittedly from the liberal wing of the
party, have publicly urged the prime minister, Theresa May, ‘to up her game,’ with
calls for a ‘big idea,’ a ‘vision of the future more uplifting’ that what we
have seen from her so far.
It could be that they are just laying the ground work for replacing her as leader, but it is certainly true, try as she has, May, just doesn’t inspire anyone with her vague rhetoric, delivered in trade mark, robotic fashion. To be fair to May though, no one else in the party seems to be able to come up with anything credible either, save Michael Gove’s exhuming of previous leader David Cameron’s greening of their image. I think the Tories problems run much deeper though, than the present leadership.
May has made
a number of speeches setting out her vision, from when she first became leader,
on the back of the Brexit vote, in a speech outside 10 Downing Street, claiming
she would defend the interests of ‘working people,’ ‘the left behind,’ and the
‘just about managing.’ Then there was the Lancaster House speech a year ago,
where she railed against the ‘citizens of nowhere,’ meaning global corporations
and their management and liberal thinkers more generally.
The latest
attempt was a piece written for the Observer
newspaper, last
Sunday, titled ‘I will fine greedy bosses who betray their workers,’ pledging
to toughen up company pension laws, in the wake of the Carillion scandal. Company
executives loosened their rules around bonus payments to themselves, just
before the company went bust, with a £500 million pounds deficit in their
pension fund.
We heard this
type of thing before the general election which went so disastrously for the
Tories and May herself. No one really believes anything much will change, it is
just empty rhetoric. In last year’s general election, the Tories only finished
as the largest party because some Labour supporters who voted for Brexit,
backed the Tories to deliver the hardest form of leaving the EU. It was a
double edged sword though, with many Remain voters deserting the Tories, and
mainly backing Labour, and May duly lost the small Parliamentary majority she had
inherited.
James Frayne
a Tory member and also of the think-tank, Policy Exchange, writing on the
Conservative Home website for party activists, identifies six barriers to people
voting Tory. He says
these are, healthcare, being a party for the rich, public service cuts,
cultural hostility, liberal social attitudes and a lack of positivity in
campaigning. All of these things do make it difficult for the Tories to connect
with some, mainly younger and Metropolitan voters. In London, for example, the
Tories were nearly completely wiped out in last year’s general election.
Frayne
concedes that in the short term anyway these barriers may be insurmountable,
but thinks that a proper audit of these areas needs to be undertaken urgently.
Lord Ashcroft, the pollster and former deputy chair of the Tory party, also writing at Conservative Home, says that the Tories can’t rely on
Brexit to win them the next general election. Apart from making a complete mess
of Brexit, at some stage a post Brexit deal with the EU is bound to upset some
of their MPs and supporters, perhaps all, whether it is soft or hard.
Ashcroft
concludes his piece by saying, ‘the post-Brexit political landscape won’t be
shaped after the deal is done, it is being shaped now. Without some ideas, the
Tories will surrender much of it to the left without firing a shot.’
So, much
angst in the Tory party about future prospects then, and they are surely right
to worry about their unpopularity with voters under 50 of years of age. The
longer we wait for the next general election, the more there will be of younger
voters coming onto the register, and more elderly ones leaving the register, by
dying.
The problem
as I see it for the Tories, is of ideology, that is, private markets are the
solution to everything. Before Margaret Thatcher became Tory leader, it was a
quite pragmatic party, bending with the times, although always the party of the
establishment. Post Thatcher, the Tories became very ideological, neo-liberal
front runners at the time. Political cycles do run their term, and are replaced
by another, different orthodoxy, and perhaps we have reached this point now.
Harold Macmillan,
as Tory housing minister and prime minister built hundreds of thousands of
council houses, and was popular amongst the working class for it. This
pragmatism is now nowhere to be seen.
Take the
housing crisis, for example. Selling off council houses, at as much as a 50%
discount, in the 1980s was very popular with people living in good properties,
in reasonably good areas. The house price inflation that we have had over the
last 30 years, has also been good for those who own property, older people.
These older people benefited from the welfare state, with good housing and free
higher education, but now the less wealthy younger people, are being shut out
from these things.
The Tories
approach to the housing crisis, is a help to buy scheme which will cost
billions to the tax payer, but benefit less than an estimated 4,000 people. The
slight raising of the cap on what local authorities can borrow to build houses,
in as yet undefined areas ‘of high demand’ is again piecemeal, given the scale
of the housing crisis.
But we are
back to market ideology again, because you ‘can’t buck the market,’ as Thatcher
was fond of saying. But the market is failing for all to see in housing
provision. If the Tories don’t change their ideology they won’t be able to
attract younger voters, and they may become largely an ageing, white, rural
party, rather than a truly national party.
The younger generation are wise to the fact that you can't have exponential economic growth on a planet with finite resources. Neo liberal capitalism only works if you ignore the environmental and social impacts for everyone but the very rich, and even they cannot ignore the fact that they too have to breathe clean air and drink clean water. Properties have been used as 'investments' and not homes, regulations are, by the young at least, seen as protections rather than 'red tape'. Barriers to social mobility, such as low wages and high tuition fees are seen for what they are. Tories are exposed for outdated attitudes to the poor and vulnerable and their oppression of these groups are plain to see. As young people are forced into substandard accommodation, at sky high rents with only zero hours 'self employment' contracts to try to make a living, they experience the poverty that many have had to endure and this is going to colour their view of the future under a Tory government, one which they do not relish.
ReplyDelete"The Tories approach to the housing crisis, is a help to buy scheme which will cost billions to the tax payer, but benefit less than an estimated 4,000 people."
ReplyDeleteIt doesn't build more houses, it simply increases prices.