Reported by
Anthony Barej and first published at Public
Finance Magazine
Council
papers showed in 2014 the council estimated over the next five years it would
require £110m to maintain its housing stock but was only able to earmark £64m,
leaving a £46m shortfall.
This placed
the council under pressure to find ways to fund necessary work, including the
sale of assets and cost-cutting, according to the council’s HousingRevenue Account (HRA) business plan from 2015.
Planning
documents show RBKC reduced its original budget for the work on the tower to
£9.7m after it decided on using cheaper materials in the Grenfell
Tower renovations.
This was
partly due to government rules that do not allow authorities
to borrow above a cap, the plan said.
RBKC’s cap
was £221m. “Given our current debt our headroom for borrowing is only £11.4m,”
the plan stated.
This £11.4m
represented a fraction of the £110m required by the council for maintenance
across its housing stock including Grenfell, the papers showed.
“Given, the
limited scope for additional borrowing, the intention is to not use it to fund
maintenance work but to invest in future regeneration or development of
affordable housing,” the document explained.
A
spokesperson for RBKC said: “Refurbishment works are likely to feature in the
upcoming public inquiry into the Grenfell Tower fire.
“We want to
be open and transparent, but we hope people understand that we also do not want
to prejudice the fair conduct of the public inquiry in any way.”
No comments:
Post a Comment