The Australian multi-national corporation Lendlease,
has threatened Haringey Council in north London with legal action if it cancels
the contract for gentrification of its housing stock. The Haringey Development
Vehicle (HDV), was agreed by the council under the leadership of Claire Kober,
who has now resigned as a councillor to
take up a post as the new director of housing at Pinnacle Group, another
housing developer.
Many of the Labour councillors who supported Kober and
HDV have now stood down, and their replacements were all
anti-HDV, along with most of the council’s social housing tenants. Indeed it
was this very issue that forced Kober and her supporters out, just prior to this
year’s local government elections in May.
HDV is a form of social cleansing, where social housing
(where rents are around 30% of the market rate) is replaced with homes for sale
or at full market rate rent. Lendlease have agreed to provide 1000 homes for ‘affordable
rent’ (around 80% of the market rate), which amounts only about 10% of the
homes in the new development.
We have previously reported about the HDV fiasco on this
blog, here,
here
and here. HDV
was challenged
in the High Court, where Lendlease won, but is currently awaiting
an appeal judgement.
The Chief Executive Officer of Lendlease, Dan Labbard,
has written two letters this month to the new leader of the council, and the
Chief Executive, one on 4 July (see
here) and the latest on 9 July (see
here). In the 9 July letter he says that ‘we will have no choice but to seek
to protect Lendlease’s interests given very significant investment over the
last two and half years.’ This includes no doubt the cost of defending the High
Court Judicial Review and the appeal, but this is all part of the democratic
processes in the UK, which the company appears to hold in complete contempt.
Labbard goes on to say:
‘It is important that in reviewing the HDV at the
Cabinet on 17 July, the Council does not take any steps which infringes or damages
Lendlease’s rights. Most obiviously, it is not open to the Council in such
circumstances to attempt to abandon the procurement, in which Lendlease was
selected and then confirmed as the successful bidder.’
He says the council:
‘Must not take any decision which would be irrational,
in particular, in the context of the borough’s urgent need for housing – which requires
very significant investment and capability.’
So there you have it. Lendlease is threatening
Haringey Council with a lawsuit to recover costs and compensation if HDV is
cancelled, and their reasoning is that the council would be acting irrationally
if they did. There is no doubt that Haringey does have an urgent need for new
housing, as does much of London, but HDV is not what is needed by any rational
measure.
HDV would demolish thousands of social housing units
and replace them with high cost accommodation, either for sale or rent. Most of
the existing tenants would not be able to afford even the 10% of homes that
would be available for ‘affordable’ rent, let alone the other 90%. HDV is
nothing to do with addressing the borough’s urgent housing needs, but all about
Lendlease making a big fat profit by throwing less wealthy people out of their
homes and moving wealthier people into the new developments.
It is crystal clear that the previous Labour
leadership of the council were kicked out of office (replaced by anti-HDV councilors),
because the scheme is so unpopular locally, so why should this development
proceed? Where is the rationally in that?
Similar developments are planned or happening in other
parts of London, where they are unpopular too, precisely because they do not address
the housing crisis in London in any kind of satisfactory way. The will of the
people, to borrow a phrase from the head banging Brexiters, is being held in
contempt here, so I do hope the new council tells Lendlease where to go.
There is a lobby of the council Cabinet meeting on Tuesday
17 July at 5.30pm at Haringey Civic Centre. Those who wish to observe the
meeting will be able to do so from the council chamber balcony, but people should
do so respectfully.
More information at StopHDV
Thanks, Mike.
ReplyDeleteMeanwhile central government funding for local authorities closing in about a year or two, and the fact that Child Poverty Action Group e-mailed me this past week saying: "Half of all children in the UK live in families who will receive universal credit when the rollout is complete..."
Central government and Kober Haringey policy has been to besmirch the reputation of benefit claimants and social housing tenants so much that outside the polling wards affected by HDV, public opposition has been minimised.
The scenario of central government abandoning funding of local authorities and the fallout from 'Universal Credit full roll-out' in themselves represent a 'perfect storm' of the sort highlighted in an 2015 poster campaign 'The Perfect Storm'. The Charity Commissioners told Oxfam that they were being 'too political'.
In the event of UC full roll-out and unaffordable Council Tax demands on those too poor to pay Council Tax, no doubt Lendlease are banking on Haringey's housing stock tenants getting evicted so as to crate 'vacant possession'.
How was that Charity Commission clampdown on Oxfam's 'heads up' for censorship so that UK society could 'sleepwalk' into the clutches of monsters like Lendlease?
Alan Wheatley
UPDATE - Tonight Cabinet decided not to proceed with the HDV. Other decisions included establishing a Fairness Commission and establishing a wholly owned company to provide more affordable homes.
ReplyDelete