Lawyers acting for Extinction Rebellion (XR) have applied to the High Court for a judicial reveue into the Metropolitan Police’s blanket ban on ecological protests across the whole of London. The police issued the ban under a section 14 of the Public Order Act on Monday night, effectively outlawing protests by XR in the city.
Since imposing
the order, the police have cleared Trafalgar Square of protesters, where the
activists had previously been allowed, even encouraged, by the authorities to
move their protests to this single site. No laws were being broken in the
Square, but now the police’s change of tack risks criminalising peaceful
protest, which is a fundamental right of any democracy worthy of the name.
A protest camp
at Vauxhall Pleasure Gardens, south of the Thames, was also dismantled on
Tuesday, even though again, no laws were being broken and the local authority,
the London Borough of Lambeth, had given permission for protesters to be there. Smaller protests around the capital have continued, with over 1,600 arrests made by police.
This is a very
worrying development, where the police can effectively ban any peaceful protest
they want to. It has all the hallmarks of a police state, not a state that
adheres to the rule of law, and the police surely know this.
The Green party
MEP Ellie Chowns was among those arrested in Trafalgar Square on Monday night.
She is now one of several claimants in the judicial review. She said she had
not even been part of XR’s protests but was arrested after asking questions of
police about the legality of their actions.
There has
clearly been political pressure applied to the police, presumably by the new Home
Secretary, Priti Patel, the hardline ‘law and order’ minister. The Mayor of
London, Sadiq Khan, has distanced himself from the action, which he was
apparently not consulted about. But why has such draconian action has been taken,
when the protests only caused minor inconvenience to the public in the city?
I work in
Westminster where many of the road blocking protests have taken place, and what
has struck me is that many of my work colleagues, who normally take little
interest in ecological matters, have commented how much better the environment
is in the area, without all of the usual traffic clogging up roads and spewing
toxic fumes into the air. There has been no great outcry from the public for
the protests to be stopped.
However, plans
to disrupt the underground train network on Thursday may well change public
perceptions, if they go ahead. I hope XR re-thinks this one, because apart from
the potential loss of public support for the rebels, they should be encouraging
the use of public transport, especially electric powered transport. Will this
action force workers into their cars or onto diesel powered buses? I think it
will, so is rather counter-productive.
I think the
main reason that the police have taken this unprecedented action is that they
are over extended, and can’t cope with the protests carrying for the rest of
this week. I have seen police vans in the area from Kent and even Scotland, so obviously
these police officers have been drafted into London, indicating just how stretched the
London police are.
But could not
another approach have been attempted? The police were quick to say that the protests
were taking officers away from more important work, like tackling street crime
in the city. Well, why not concentrate their resources on that then? The protests
only need minimal policing, what does it matter if a few roads are blocked?
Privately, some officers have commented as much, but their orders are to keep
the traffic moving around London, in the process poisoning the public in the
area.
I guess it comes
down to money, as all seem to these days. There is an economic cost to
businesses in London, although not that great in reality. It is perhaps no
coincidence either that the hardline stance began after protests in the city of
London began, the centre of the money making machine in the UK. Can’t have that
happening can we?
“This judgment is a vindication of those who have sought to defend our crucial right to protest,” Monbiot said
ReplyDeletePorter & Malouf P.A.