This is an edited extract from a report written by Jane Susanna Ennis.
Friday 10 November, afternoon Plenary
Pierre
Laurent and Olivier Dartigolles of the PCF, spoke of solidarity with migrants
and refugees, and said that there could be a whole new era for progressive
forces (the Left, socialists and ecologists). Laurent referred to the need to
construct a radically new Left in Europe, as there are many threats to
democracy, for instance the rise of populism and also said that the Social Forum should be a
yearly event, a space for uniting progressive forces in Europe.
Marco
Revelli, an Italian comrade from L’Altra Europa con Tsipras, spoke about the Sicilian
regional elections, which resulted in a win for the Right, and about the
general rise of Neo-Fascism in Italy. The Five Star Movement (M5S) was never a
left-wing movement!! There is even a risk that the left might end up as a
minority in the European Parliament. The
rights of people in the lower echelons of society are those which are most
threatened. This comrade too referred to the danger posed by populists.
Another
French comrade said that to some extent we are still fighting Fascism…..we are
certainly fighting the rise of neo-Fascism, while a Danish comrade (Mads B. Petersen) referred
to the constant efforts by employers in his country to undermine trade unions.
Brexit and Free Movement
The speakers
referred to the increase in hate crimes, the first hate crimes were perpetrated
literally 24 hours after the referendum result was announced. There are serious
implications for the Northern Ireland Peace Process, and all our Freedom of
Movement as EU citizens is at risk. The LEAVE campaign was based on racism,
xenophobia and Islamophobia.
Andrew Burgin
(Another Europe is Possible, the Alliance for Free Movement) spoke of the
necessity for the European Forum in view of the crisis in European politics,
and where Brexit fits into this. The problems include Trump and the rise of the
Far Right. The social base of the Brexit vote had an element of opposition to
globalisation – it was basically a Tory, white, nationalist vote, although
there was an element of working-class resentment. It has hardly been a success
for the Left! Since the referendum, there has been a 90% drop in nurses and
agricultural workers coming from the EU, and we need to discuss the rights of
EU nationals in the UK. We need to campaign for a United Socialist States of
Europe.
The next
speaker was Felicity Dowling. She pointed out that the British working class has
suffered a big drop in wages and an increase in precariousness and Zero Hours
Contracts. The housing crisis has worsened due to the fact that young people
can no longer claim Housing Benefit; young women still don’t get equal pay and
local authority services have been cut to the bone.
The UK is a
financial capital, not a manufacturing society anymore; the City of London is
based on financial dealing, the rest of the economy has been globalised. The American model of low wages and fewer
workers’ rights has been introduced, rather than the EU social model, and we
need a campaign to make people realise that the EU isn’t their enemy. She finally
made the point that those who voted REMAIN didn’t advocate staying on economic
grounds, but OPPOSED LEAVING ON POLITICAL GROUNDS.
The next
speaker was Francis Molloy (Sinn Fein). He pointed out that Europe (the EU that
is) is a friend of Northern Ireland, and that Sinn Fein is a party of the Left,
standing for a United Ireland and an equal, but reserves the right to be
critical of Europe. Brexit, in the view of Sinn Fein, is a disaster, but could
represent an opportunity for Irish Unity, as people in UIster would vote for a
United Ireland in order to stay in the EU.
If Brexit
goes ahead, and Northern Ireland doesn’t get special status, they will lose all
the current protections and civil rights guaranteed by membership of the EU.
The re-introduction of borders would be most unwelcome.
One Europe peace and freedom
Some of the
discussion was about ‘social dumping;’ and it was suggested that the Poles and
the Ukrainians are the most hostile to the idea of accepting refugees.
A Greek
comrade said that Greek society in in principle sensitive to the protection of
immigrants, in spite of attempts to blockade the Balkan corridor – Greece would
continue to protect migrants and refugees, and also the LGBT community. Greek
citizenship is now being offered to the grandchildren of Holocaust victims.
A French
comrade suggested that there is almost a war against migrants, and that
solidarity with them is being criminalised. There is massive police violence
against migrants in France, especially in working-class districts, and criminal
proceedings have only ever been taken against one officer who killed a young
refugee (he received a suspended sentence). The comrade delivered a stirring
polemic against racism.
There was
also a talk by a Belgian comrade from the Movement for International
Solidarity.
Saturday 11 November
Morning session: Labour and social rights in Europe
A French
comrade started the session with a critique of Zero Hours Contracts and
precariousness (casualization), which is a particular problem in the UK ……..
outlined the dangers of ZHCs for workers. Reference was also made to the Jobs
Act in Italy .
A Belgian
comrade indicated that there are three layers of negotiation between management
and unions. In Belgium young people who leave school and don’t immediately find
employment are entitled to unemployment benefit.
Then there
was a talk by Gabrielle Zimmer of DIE LINKE in Germany. She said that the EU
needs a social dimension; we need to consider not only people’s working lives
(including job security) but also their personal and cultural needs – we need
to introduce social rights for EU citizens. She stressed the need for health
insurance, and noted the rise of homeless people in major cities, such as
Cologne, where there have even been fights between German and Romanian
homeless.
She stressed
the need for the Left to unite, it is vital for us not to quarrel among
ourselves.
A Polish
comrade spoke on the subject of inequality, which he said was one of the main
causes of the current crisis in Europe. He also referred to the fact that many
jobs are vanishing because of automation and to wage inequalities between
countries in Europe – some of this fuels the rise of the Far Right. The length
of the working week (and working day) was also discussed.
The next
speaker was Johann Peter Andersen of the Norwegian RED PARTY. Norway is not a
member of the EU, but is a member of the EEA. In Norway, the forces against
membership were on the Left.
He referred
to the problem of ‘social dumping’. The Red Party believed that workers from
Eastern Europe (Poland, etc.), should be employed for Norwegian wages, not be
used to undercut wages.
They believe
that we can all co-operate in the struggle to reduce working hours. The
Norwegian public sector unions are campaigning for a 6-hour working day, as are
those in Sweden.
A Young
Communist from France spoke of a huge movement in France, particularly among
young people, against the neo-liberal project – he said that Macron was a 19th
century liberal rooted in the past. There should be a joint programme with
Youth Organisations and the Trade Union movement to combat neo-liberalism……we
are now feeling the adverse effects of neo-liberal policies throughout Europe,
and we need to find points of convergence.
The next
speaker was from Finland, and was the first to mention the question of Animal
Rights. The call to activate civil society was repeated.
The
contribution by Julie Ward, MEP, was in my opinion one of the best
contributions to the debate. One of the things she is most passionate about is
the role of the arts in society, and the fact that everyone should have access
to the arts, including being able to participate.
She talked
about the fact that so many jobs are unfulfilling, demeaning and pointless….we
should campaign to make work safe and fulfilling for people. She also referred
to the damaging cuts to libraries and social services, these roles should not
be filled by volunteers but by trained professionals, and paid accordingly.
There should
be a balance between work, family and leisure, and Lifelong Learning should be
available to everyone. The fact that public services, the NHS and the welfare
state meant that people are looked after ‘From Cradle to Grave’ is a GOOD THING
– it is not good to demonised the disabled, She referred to the UN damning
report about the treatment of the disabled and disadvantaged in the UK.
Afternoon Session
Towards a sustainable development
model
The first
speaker was from TRANSFORM! Europe, a European Left Think-Tank. She outlined
some proposals for the ecological transformation of Europe, including
developing the use of renewables, the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions,
and the investigation of agri-business practices. The current industrial model
should be completely transformed; we need to reduce our dependence on cars, and
we need to protect Nature and the Earth. It is acknowledged that the ecological
transformation would be very costly, especially for countries which rely very
heavily on fossil fuel.
The question
of economic sustainability must also be addressed.
We next heard
from Heinz Bierbaum from DIE LINKE. He
spoke of the need to develop a Europe 2020 strategy to unite industrial policy
and the social and ecological transformation of society – this requires
investment in public infrastructure.
The European
Trade Union Confederation proposes a programme of investment in public
infrastructure, social housing and education. We should be producing goods that
fulfil social and ecological needs – some trade unions have been working on
transferring military goods into social goods.
We need industrial democracy, the participation of workers in corporate
policy.
The speaker
from the Parti Communiste Francais was the first to elaborate upon the threat
of insecticides to wildlife, especially bees, and threats to food supply – the
example of contaminated eggs. There should be stricter international food
quality regulation. The general topic of Climate Change was raised, with
reference to the increase in Climate Refugees, and the future of the Arctic.
The riches of the earth should be confiscated from the multi-nationals.
Fiona Edwards
from the British Labour Party also made the link between Climate Change and
poverty, and pointed out that Western Europe is still not doing enough to cut
carbon emissions – perhaps not surprisingly, right-wing governments are
especially remiss in this area. She said that Jeremy Corbyn has plans to end
austerity and create ‘green jobs’. The era of fossil fuels must come to an end.
A comrade
from the French organisation ENSEMBLE also took up the question of a social
Europe, and the need for the integration of economic, social and cultural
policy. The subject of the Mafia was also raised!! Water and waste treatment
are very lucrative for the Mafia , and the Camorra makes more money
through trafficking waste than through
drugs.
Mike Davies
of the Alliance for Green Socialism introduced the subject of Zero Growth or
de-growth (décroissance). Economic growth is not actually a good thing, but a
disaster, there can be no such such thing as Green Growth, and the idea of
de-growth or Zero Growth should be more actively.
Unfortunately,
the pressures of time didn’t allow him to develop this point in detail, so he
came under criticism from other speakers for advocating a sort of ‘deep
ecology’ in an unscientific manner…….a pity, because it could have been a valid
point if there had been more time to develop it. Someone pointed out that
Ecology is a SCIENCE. I have found a
partial definition here – as it says, ‘degrowth’ is not the same as
‘downsizing’.
A speaker
from the PCF referred to the inadequacy of ‘greenwashing’. Environmental issues
should be included on all political programmes.
She introduced the idea of ‘negative VAT’, taxing anything that could be
detrimental to society. The root of the problem is CAPITAL….not just
accumulated wealth, which could be used to improve people’s lives instead of
using it AGAINST people and the environment. We need to develop public
services, and the common good must come first. Environmental and social issues
need to be reworked and fully integrated.
Final Session
Where do we
go from here, should there be a standing forum, and in which case, what form
should it take? A young Austrian comrade said that Europe (the EU) should be a
force for peace).
Panel Discussion
All speakers
were in agreement as to what the next forum should discuss – social questions,
ecological questions, economic questions; campaigning against economic power
and exploitation.
Gregor Gysi,
from the European Left, spoke of the need for the Left to be united, and for us
to campaign in solidarity for a democratic, ecologically responsible EU.
Environmental reform must go hand in hand with social justice. We need to be
wary of the ghost of Fascism.
It was concluded that
We therefore
undertake to organise a second European Forum of leftist, green and progressive
forces, to be held in 2018. To achieve this we will establish a technical
working group, comprising representatives of the diverse forces participating
in these two days, which, in consultation with the organisations present here,
will propose the format of the second edition. The goal is for the next Forum
to continue the work that we have initiated this year, going into more depth
and achieving broader participation.
Jane Susanna Ennis is a member of
Camden Green Party and a Green Left supporter
It's just natural selection
ReplyDeletehttps://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/class-warfare-fuels-trump-and-brexit-by-yanis-varoufakis-2017-12