The concept of transitional demands will be familiar to traditional socialists, particularly those followers of Leon Trotsky’s theories of socialism, although, I hasten to add, Trotsky was no ecosocialist. These demands are designed to appear to sound reasonable to the average citizen, and not directly lead to the overthrow of capitalism, but instead to create a pathway to socialism. They are more than just asking for reforms to the capitalist system, although they would be reforms, but they are not ends in themselves.
Much as I
would like to see the overthrow of the capitalist system, and as an
ecosocialist, I believe that this is necessary if we are to solve the climate crisis
and the many other bad effects, both ecological and social, that capitalism creates. But there just isn’t enough time left.
If we are
brutally honest with ourselves, a revolution to replace capitalism with
ecosocialism is not on the horizon, and the well-being of the earth and all
those (human and non-human) who inhabit it are in such deep peril now, we
really can’t afford to wait until those conditions arise, as they surely will
at some stage. We need mitigating action now.
So, which sort
of demands should ecosocialists be making? Given the urgency of the situation
on climate change particularly, with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change (IPCC) in its latest assessment saying that we need to cut carbon
emissions by 45% by 2030, to avoid catastrophic changes to the environment,
this is the main goal that we need to pursue. But not the only one.
The IPCC is infamously
conservative in its estimates though, so I would suggest that we need to be
more ambitious than the 45% reductions by 2030 recommended. A more effective
target would be something like a 70% reduction within the same timeframe.
The symptoms
of the ecological crisis are likely to be more: drought, floods, increasingly strong
hurricanes, species loss, deforestation, rising sea levels, bleached coral
reefs, ocean acidification and pollution of the air, land and sea, with plastic
waste becoming an even greater problem than it is now.
The knock on effects that all of this will have on the earth’s delicate ecosystems is incalculable, but is likely to be severe, and maybe lead to the extinction of much of life on the planet, including human beings. The stakes are high.
The knock on effects that all of this will have on the earth’s delicate ecosystems is incalculable, but is likely to be severe, and maybe lead to the extinction of much of life on the planet, including human beings. The stakes are high.
A starting
point for a transitional demand is the Green New Deal, which found favour first
with Green Parties in the US and UK, and has now been a adopted in the UK by
the Labour Party, and there are moves in the US for the Democratic Party to
take the idea on board.
The exact
nature of the plan may differ in the UK and US, especially if elements of the
Democrats manage to water down proposals, but basically it calls for massive
investment in a move to build renewable energy capacity and an equally massive programme
of insulating homes and workplaces. The practice of carbon trading used in the
European Union should be ended and replaced with real reductions, alongside the
Green New Deal.
The Green New
Deal, on its own, is not enough to get to where we need to be. Nevertheless, it would
lead to a cut in the burning of fossil fuels, which is needed, with the added
advantage of providing well paid employment, which is likely to gain the
support of the public. As ecosocialists we know that if we are to be successful
we need to take the people with us, and the Green New Deal has the potential to
do this.
Our problems
do not end with producing clean energy for homes and workplaces though, we need
to tackle the carbon emissions from transport, specifically private cars and
trucks, air transport and shipping. The solutions in this area will be most
easily achieved by a kind of back to the future plan. With shipping for
example, we need to return to using wind power together with solar
power, and perhaps an emergency engine to be used only when strictly necessary.
This could quite easily be done.
Aviation is
more problematic in that simple solutions are not readily available, but a
return to propeller planes, maybe electrically powered, could be used for all
short haul flights, but long haul will need to be rationed, with more use,
particularly by business of video conferencing. Airport expansion should be stopped
completely. This is a more difficult sell, but with the environmental crisis
worsening, can probably be achieved.
Cars and trucks
can instead be electrically powered relatively easily, but it is doubtful
enough power can be generated from renewable sources for the numbers of
vehicles currently in use, so a massive public transit programme is needed to
get people out of cars and onto public transport. Again an added advantage to
this is it will provide jobs.
We also need
to campaign against imperialist wars, where the US military in particular is a
huge user of fossil fuels and the resultant carbon emissions that are produced.
This, of course, is a big ask. I have campaigned myself for years against these
imperialist interventions without success, but it has only been in more recent times
that I've made the connection to climate change. Might that be a game changer,
perhaps it will with our very existence at stake?
The problem
of plastic pollution also has a solution from the past. The current vogue, if
we can call it that, for recycling needs to be increased, but some plastics are
unrecyclable. We need to use less, certainly of these types of plastics. In
fairly recent times, such as my childhood, there wasn’t anywhere near the
amount of packaging used. This needs to be reduced significantly, and deposit
returnable glass bottles need to make a comeback. That plastics are made from oil
or coal exacerbates this problem.
We need a
massive reforestation effort, to enlarge habitats for wildlife and to take
existing carbon out of the atmosphere. Farming should be returned to organic
methods, and we should stop the use of pesticides which are over used at
present. We need to eat much less meat, especially beef and dairy products, and
fish, and to eat more vegetables and fruit. This would need to be voluntary though, as I can't see legislation on the issue working.
All of this
has to be done on a global scale to have the required effect, and quickly, but
is not that difficult to achieve, once the will is there, or forced to be
there. These are eminently reasonable demands, but will it set us on a pathway
to ecosocialism? I think it may well do so.
Even though this
is all feasible, there will be resistance from the capitalists, at which point
it will become obvious to most people that it is the system which is obstructing
progress and therefore will increasingly be seen as the villain here. If they
were to comply, it would be the beginning of the end for capitalism, because it
needs ever increasing amounts of energy to fuel the growth it needs to survive,
so they won’t.
Once this
realisation dawns on the mass of the population who do not do so well out of
the system anyway, we will have arrived at our revolutionary moment. It will be
fertile ground for the toppling of the regime of capital and the move to
ecosocialism. The logic of the system will be exposed, and logic of replacing
it unstoppable, if we want a future worth living.
No comments:
Post a Comment