It is more
than two years now since the referendum on the UK’s membership of the European
Union (EU), where of course we voted to leave. It has been a feature, during
the referendum campaign itself and in the period since, that those who
advocated Brexit haven’t come up with any sort of plan for life outside of the
union. What kind of relationship with the EU do they want, if any at all?
Lofty talk
of global trade deals and vague sloganising like ‘take back control’ have been
the order of the day, but no specifics have been put forward by the loudest
cheerleaders for Brexit in the Tory party. At long last, the penny seems to
have dropped with these people, that it might be a good idea to have one. However,
this plan looks to be purely cosmetic.
I suspect
that this has been forced on the Brexiteers for two main reasons. Firstly, they
don’t like the prime minister’s Chequers plan, as they see it as not really
leaving the EU. Secondly, public opinion in Britain seems to be shifting to
favour either a ‘soft’ Brexit or another
referendum on the final agreement between the UK and EU, which could well result
in a vote to remain in the EU.
Whatever
the motivation, the Sun
reports that the European Research Group (ERG) of Tory MPs are to ‘ambush’
Theresa May with a plan for a ‘clean Brexit’ just days before the Tory
conference in September. A source told the paper: "This is about
delivering the clean Brexit that people voted for. No concessions."
The plan is
for the UK to have a Canada-style free trade agreement with the EU. But get
this, only if the EU drops its objections to having a border on the island of
Ireland. If the EU will not agree to this there will be no deal at tall, and
the UK will trade on World Trade Organisation (WTO) terms, with the bloc.
Canada and
the EU have signed the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA), which
is essentially a free trade agreement, removing most tariffs on trade in goods between
the two trading partners and some more limited access for services. Border
controls are still in place for people and goods, so if the UK were to adopt
such an agreement, it would not solve the problems of delays with imports at UK
and exports at EU ports or the situation with the border in Ireland.
I think the
plan is hypothetical anyway, because I can’t see any way that the EU will back
down on the Irish border issue. We could have a CETA type deal otherwise, but
the ERG have ruled this out for some reason. So, we are basically back to a no
deal Brexit, and falling back on WTO trade rules. Hardly much of a plan?
I don’t think
any country in the world trades on WTO rules only, but of course in the longer
run trade deals can be negotiated, like the Trans-Pacific Partnership which the
government has explored joining or bi-lateral trade arrangements with other
nations. All of which takes time and skilled trade deal negotiators though, neither
of which we have much of.
Under WTO
rules, each member must grant the same ‘most favoured nation’ market access, to
all other WTO members. This means that exports to the EU would be subject to
the same customs checks, tariffs and regulatory barriers that the UK and EU
currently charge on trade with countries such as the US. The UK’s exports to
the EU and other WTO members would also be subject to the importing countries’
most favoured nation tariffs. But tariffs all the same.
EU tariffs on
WTO goods range from zero to 45%, with the average tariff being 4.8%, making
British goods under such arrangements, less competitive in the EU marketplace.
Of course, costs could be reduced by UK exporters, to cover the difference, but
this will almost certainly mean cutting the wages of British workers.
Alternately, businesses may relocate to the EU, where it is feasible and
advantageous, taking British jobs with them.
The
Alt-Brexit plan turns out to be really no plan at all, with even a Canada style
deal out of the question if there is no agreement on keeping the Irish border
open. It is just a long winded way of crashing out of the EU with no deal
whatsoever, with all of the problems that will bring for the UK. And more time
wasted on pointless negotiations.
Brexit was always about preserving the British Tax Havens in the face of the EU Anti Tax Avoidance Directive (2016/1164). All else is, was, and will be irrelevant.
ReplyDeleteWTO tariffs are maxima and can be set lower or not at all but not higher. EU tariffs on imported raw materials are very much higher. In addition unlike the EU system WTO does not treat Africa as a colony and stifle development. WTO is a much better system and one that we already work to.
ReplyDeleteVoted for the unaccountable and undemocratic WTO recently? Know anything aboit the secretive WTO court? WTO is giving away control.
Delete