Some of the
biggest names in the UK independent left media have joined forces to promote
their very own news narrative. Skwarkbox, The Canary, Evolve Politics, Another
Angry Voice, Media Lens and Real Media are amongst them. This consortium has
recently set up a Facebook group titled ‘Independent Media UK’ which has grown
quickly in members. I was aware of this initiative from reading a post on
Skwarkbox, but later in the day someone ‘joined’ me into this group.
I assumed
that this person thought it was worthwhile me joining the group, as an
independent left blogger, and posting links to my blog posts. I did indeed post
a link into the group, but a day later a new rule was introduced that only the
admins could now post on the group. I think these admins are connected to the
above mentioned media outlets.
With not the
slightest trace of irony, a pinned post from The Canary introduces the group
thus:
Welcome, to what will become the
largest progressive FB group in the UK. Facebook is making changes that reduce
the amount of truly independent media and campaigning journalism you see in
your news feed. So we have come together to ensure you never miss breaking
news, analysis and opinion on the issues that matter to you.
Spread the word!
They then
immediately shut down any posts from outside of their consortium, blaming this
on Facebook, then set up err… a Facebook group which censors outside
postings. One commenter did call it ‘controlling the narrative,’ and I think this
is right. Another way of describing it is censorship for those not in the gang.
There were a few more comments against the move but most group members appeared
to be in favour. They may have been friends of the admins though, I don’t know.
One of these
comments was ‘we are all in this together, that’s for sure….filthy rotten
platform it is, Facebook.’ I’ve had my own problems posting onto Facebook,
mainly because of too many posts, or posts too quickly added to various groups.
They don’t seem to like you getting something for nothing, but it is not as
though I make any money from my posts. The irony of the situation, banning
other independent media in the group, was again lost on this commenter.
This
consortium of large media sites are to a greater or lesser extent commercial
sites, they earn money through advertising and reader donations, whereas my
blog, and many mostly quite small outlets are non-commercial, and operate on a
share a like commons licence, which is the most ethical way for independent left media to
operate.
I twice
posted a link to my blog in the comments thread, but both times they were
quickly removed, with no explanation offered as to why. Obviously the people
who have set up this group can do what like in terms who can post and what, but
then to claim that this is a truly independent media site is disingenuous. It
is filtered media, and exclusive to the biggest independent left media
sites.
I think it
also very arrogant of these big sites to insist on being the only on-line word
of truth and interest, and rather un-comradely. The Green Left Facebook group for example allows posts from all of these left media sites, but maybe in light
of what they are doing on their group, perhaps we should respond in kind, and
ban them? Maybe other groups would follow suit?
It is not as
though these big sites need much extra publicity and feeds as they are
available on many feeds, many of which I subscribe to, so apart from anything
else it just looks greedy and vindictive. I intend to boycott these sites in
future.
Maybe us
smaller left media outlets should get together and start our own media Facebook
group? But I would suggest that it is not exclusive like Independent Media UK,
but encourages other small outlets to join and post into the group? It is worth
thinking about I think. What do other bloggers think?
I’ve quit the
Independent Media UK Facebook group now, and will leave them to their echo chamber
discussions. How quickly these alternative media outlets turned into an
establishment of their own. Some independent media sites are more equal than
others, it seems.
As somebody who edits a magazine and runs a web-site that is routinely ‘denied reference’ and has been for years, this comes as no surprise, particularly the fact Media-Lens are involved. As you say, in true Orwellian fashion, some sites are more equal than others. As to what to do about it: difficult. Copying their tactics not advisable, so I suppose the only thing is to keep on as you have been doing, and post links to sites who don’t censor.
ReplyDeleteA lot of the FB groups I post into censored this post too!
ReplyDelete