“It is not enough to be a revolutionary
and an advocate of socialism in general. It is necessary to know at every
moment how to find the particular link in the chain which must be grasped with
all one’s strength in order to keep the whole chain in place and prepare to move
on resolutely to the next link”.
Lenin,
Sochineniya, xxii, 466. November 2017.
There are no
signs today of anything comparable to the All-Russian Congress of Soviets in
the UK. Nor is there any evidence that a
serious dual power situation will ever present itself in this country, but for the
General Strike when the Prime Minister declared a State of Emergency. After 10 days into the strike and on 12th
May 1926, three member’s leaders of the TUC General Council visited 10 Downing
Street. They were swiftly challenged by Stanley Baldwin about their readiness
to take power. As they failed to grasp the
strength of their position, they called the strike off.
Much has been
made since of their “betrayal” of the working class. However those three formidable trade-union
leaders, Robert Smilie (Miners), J. H Thomas ( Railways) and Ernest Bevin (Transport) were solid social
democrats. They believed in reforming capitalism gradually rather than
overthrowing the state by revolutionary means.
Having created
the Labour Party to represent the interest of their members and of the working class
in Parliament for over a century now, the trade union movement has played a key
role in supporting social democracy in the UK.
To this day,
the Labour Party depends almost entirely on trade union members’ political levy
for the financing of its local and national elections campaigns. It is debateable
that the Labour Party would be
financially viable if links with its Affiliated Trade Unions were to be
severed.
Although it has
only been in power for 35 years since its foundation in 1900 and Ramsay
MacDonald’s first Labour administration in 1924, the Labour Party has been relatively successful
in delivering on some of its reformist electoral promises to trade union
members. The creation of the NHS by Clement Attlee’s government in 1945 remains
its most enduring legacy as does what is now left of the Welfare State.
But the Labour Party
has been out of power since 2010 and has suffered four successive electoral
defeats. This downwards trend over the last decade culminated in its historical
and humiliating crash in December 2019
when the Conservatives picked up 3.5 million former Labour voters and swept
into power with an 80 strong majority.
A review as to
why the Labour Party lost so
spectacularly in 2019 undertaken by Ed Miliband and Lucy Powell* commented that in order to win a majority of just one
under the existing First-Past-The-Post (FPTP) voting system, Labour would have to
win an additional 123-124 since
Hartlepool byelection loss - at the next General
Election. This would need a uniform swing
of 10.52%, larger than Tony Blair’s landslide in 1997 and the post-war-election of
1945.
Sir Keir Starmer is determined to win, as he keeps reminding everyone since he was elected as
the new leader of the Labour Party, but he is also acutely aware that this will
indeed be “a mountain to climb”. However, genuine concerns are being expressed
by a growing number of Labour MPs, a few trade union leaders and grass roots activists that for the Labour Party to win an absolute
majority under our existing FPTP voting system will prove to be mission impossible.
Interestingly
enough for a would-be future leader of the Labour Party and when asked by Make Vote Matters about his views on
Proportional Representation on the eve of his successful re-election as Mayor
of Greater Manchester - with a 67.3% share of
the vote - Andy Burnham declared he had
“come round to it” *.
Although trade
unions have seen a marked drop in their
membership over the past two decades, they remain a strong voice for workers
and are willing to continue providing critical
support to the political party they created.
But the key
question that is being raised is: for
how long? The dire prospect of a fifth electoral defeat in a row is concentrating
the minds.
Always
pragmatic rather than ideological, members from trade union branches and their elected
officers have begun to express their concerns. They worry that Labour may no
longer be able to deliver on their “investment”.
A suggestion
was made recently by one of the candidates for the general secretaries’ post of
a large trade union that his members’ £19 million paid into the Labour Party’s
coffers could perhaps be put to better use by investing the money in a new TV
channel.
Whilst this is
a long held dream from the left which will probably never materialise, others
are turning their attention to the role played by our unfair and undemocratic FPTP
voting system which is keeping the Conservative Party in power.
At the December
2019 General Election, the Conservative/Brexit Party electoral pact got less
than 2 million votes than all the left/centre left and nationalists parties’ votes put together. But they still won a huge majority in
Parliament because of the voting system.
As a result, we
are now subjected to the most authoritarian, criminally incompetent, and corrupt
populist government this country has ever seen.
So why should
eco-socialists concern themselves at this point “in the link of the chain” of events
about something as bourgeois as universal
suffrage?
Scrapping FPTP and replacing it with a fairer
system where every vote counts is not going to lead to a storming of the
Bastille, the Winter Palace or even the Mother of All Parliaments by the “working
class” or the working classes.
It will however
put a significant break to the grip on power by the most experienced
imperialist political party in the history of Western Democracies.
As evidenced in
Scotland for Holyrood Parliament and the Senedd in Wales where members are elected under
the Additional Member System (AMS), it is clear that such voting systems can achieve
a greater level of consensus in policies
and decision making and that voters welcome this.
We have also
seen recently how some Conservative Ministers went into panic mode with a
proposal to scrap the Supplementary Voting (SV) system used for the Mayoral
elections as Labour made some considerable gains.
In this early part
of our 21st century, we are facing an existential crisis. As declared in the Paris Ecosocialist
Conference of 2007, “Humanity today faces a stark choice: eco-socialism or
barbarism”. The survival of humanity and all living species is indeed at stake.
Time is fast running out and we all know it.
But our
democracy is broken. This is the case in the UK in particular where we are facing
the prospect of a permanent pro-capitalist authoritarian conservative /populist
government elected with a minority of
votes.
At this precise moment in time, people and young people in particular, are demanding that politicians take action
against profit driven exploitative and
polluting multi-nationals operating in
the fossil fuel, plastic, genetically modified food and poisonous agribusiness sectors.
Unfortunately, it
is hard to see how the environmental catastrophe we are facing will be stopped with
negotiated treaties or international agreements approved or implemented by
entrenched pro-capitalist politicians.
This is because
what is needed over the next decade is a
radical transformation of the world economy. We need concrete and urgent reforms to drastically reduce greenhouse gases,
fast-track the development of clean energy sources and anti-pollution
clean-ups, build an extensive free
public transport system, eliminate nuclear
energy and nuclear bombs and redistribute of wealth to eliminate poverty and
inequalities on a scale never seen before.
Under our
First-Past-the -Post voting system, our battered and fragmented Labour Party
founded by the trade union movement over 100 years ago can no longer deliver a
majority for government. It must commit to include PR in its next election
manifesto as a pre-condition to any electoral deals to keep the Tories out.
With a fair voting
system where every vote would count, together with the mobilisation of the Youth,
the labour movement as a whole and its allies from the environment and social
justice movements, such change could open the door – and minds – to the creation
of a healthy, participative democracy essential
to laying the foundation towards a 21st century
eco-socialist revolution.
https://electionreview.labourtogether.uk/chapters/the=scale-of-the-challenge
https://twitter.com/AndyBurnhamGM/status/1389630600143855618?s=20
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=we+divide+they+conquer
Claire Fairbrother is a British ecosocialist activist and a co-founder of Get PR Done !
Spot on as regards the need for PR. But I really wish the Green Party would stop calling any pro-PR pact with the NEOLIBERAL LibDems a 'Progressive' Alliance!! Since when has Thatcherism/ Neoliberalism been 'progressive'?! As it would be a pact for delivering greater democracy call it what it is: a DEMOCRATIC Alliance. Five years of ACTIVELY helping the Tories push thru' austerity - & then STILL refusing to apologise for it means the LDs do NOT deserve the 'progressive' label!
ReplyDelete