Written by Daniela Passeri and first published at il manifesto
Between 200
million and 300 million people could be forced to migrate due to the effects of
climate change by the end of the century, as long as we’re not able to keep the
temperature rise below 2 degrees Celsius as set out by the Paris Agreement.
That forecast
appears on the last page of the 2019 Report on the Green Economy, presented on
Wednesday in Rimini, Italy on the occasion of the Ecomondo fair. Although it is
difficult to make accurate and precise predictions, these numbers provide us
with an order of magnitude to judge the gravity of the phenomenon.
Furthermore,
the World Bank, in a report published last year entitled “Preparing for
Internal Climate Migration,” estimated that 143 million people could be forced
to move within their countries to escape the longterm impacts of climate
change. The phenomenon will mainly affect the poorest countries, but even Italy
will not be immune.
The report
presented on Wednesday includes a forecast of what could happen in our country
in the absence of mitigation and adaptation measures. By 2050, the number of
people exposed to the risk of flooding due to rising sea levels could range
from 72,000 to 90,000 (compared to 12,000 today), while by the end of the
century the number could rise to between 198,000-265,000.
Globally, the
largest migration movements are set to take place in around 50 countries, whose
total population is expected to double by 2050. These are countries that have
fewer resources to manage the risks, and whose survival depends precisely on
those ecosystem services (forests, coasts, lakes and rivers) that are most
under threat.
Over the past
two decades, most of the migrations due to climate change have occurred in
non-OECD countries — that is, those in the developing world — and 97% of the
people displaced due to sudden extreme climate events between 2008 and 2013
were in countries with medium-low incomes.
If we comb
through the national reports that the participant states are providing to the
secretariat of the Paris Agreement, we find that 44 out of 162 countries
(mainly from Africa, Asia Pacific and Oceania) make specific reference to the
phenomenon of migration due to the climate, whether internal or not.
The scientists
of the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) also warn about this.
In the report presented last summer dedicated to the soil and the risks of the
degradation of ecosystems, it is emphasized that these phenomena will only
amplify environmental migration, particularly in places where extreme climate
events will jeopardize food safety and the very possibility of living in
environments upset by rising temperatures or the desertification of soils.
Despite the
great number of studies on this subject, the environmental causes of migration
are not currently recognized by international law: environmental refugees have
no recognized status and are therefore not entitled to any kind of protection.
There is no convention on environmental refugees (and who knows how long it
would take to establish one), nor can the victims of climate change be included
in the category of ‘refugees’ as defined by the 1951 Geneva Convention.
Only the UN’s
Global Compact for Migration, established in 2018—and which Italy’s Conte
government has refused to sign—introduced among its objectives that of
“develop[ing] adaptation and resilience strategies to sudden-onset and
slow-onset natural disasters,” which may include drought, the consequences of
deforestation, fires, famine and pollution. Even this is little more than a
statement of intent.
According to
Filippo Miraglia, the head of migration issues for ARCI, the issue has had the
attention of the United Nations for years, but no solution has been found so
far. “I think the UN Assembly could step in by adding to the attributions of
the UN High Commission for Refugees that of intervening on behalf of climate
migrants,“ Miraglia tells us.
“Of course, we
must first define what a climate emergency is and conduct in-depth studies on
what areas of the world and what local groups are more susceptible to the risks
arising from climate change. The same scientists who are studying the climate
are well aware of the most vulnerable areas. With the help of mapping and
projections, the UNHCR would have all the means and experience needed to be
able to intervene, especially in developing countries.”
At least a third of the huge ice fields in Asia’s towering mountain chain are doomed to melt due to climate change, according to a landmark report, with serious consequences for almost 2 billion people.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/feb/04/a-third-of-himalayan-ice-cap-doomed-finds-shocking-report?fbclid=IwAR32N_bdLkmO6Dbcbb7EGPH3fan4lx4SaeAFkQdVTo1k-wxX-AIDCJHkz5o