Written by
Richard Burke and first published at Green
Social Thought
“It is time
we consider the implications of it being too late to avert a global
environmental catastrophe in the lifetimes of people alive today.” (Jem
Bendell)
In other
words, the world is coming to an end.
Of course it
is… but when?
Professor Jem
Bendell’s brilliant seminal work, “Deep Adaptation: A Map for Navigating
Climate Tragedy” d/d July 27th 2018, claims the time is now, within a decade,
not sometime in the distant future. Not only that, he suggests embracing this
transcendental experience that’s colloquially known as “End Times.”
Along those
lines, a powerful intimately conceived film by ScientistsWarningTV.org produced
by Stuart Scott captures Bendell’s inner thoughts about “what’s important” in
the face of near extinction: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6vwbanH9pgY&feature=youtu.be
Bendell’s
15-minute video monologue should be viewed in the context of the current status
of the world’s climate crisis, which is a mindboggling steroid-enhanced-CO2-laced
trip to nowhere but trouble, and it’s smack dab on target (actually ahead of
target) for a grim, bleak world that alters all life and contorts the
socio-economic compact, meaning sudden death for the “neoliberal brand” of
capitalism, which will not survive once the world comes to accept and recognize
its inherent villainy, notably its massive extensive disruption of the earth
system of life, or Gaia.
Even worse
yet, total annihilation of almost all life is a probability, a scenario that a
small minority of scientists embrace. Those scientists believe that an
extinction event is baked-in-the-cake, inevitable, inescapable within current
lifetimes because of excessive human-caused greenhouse gases such as CO2,
which, in turn, disrupts James Lovelock’s Gaia hypothesis, meaning the
biosphere has a self-regulatory effect on Earth that sustains life.
Destroy one
ecosystem and all others will fail in time and most of Earth becomes
uninhabitable.
Decidedly, as
well as factually, the planet has a long history of uninhabitable epochs known
as extinction events (five times in the past), although the past occurrences
were much slower than today’s zip zap exponential speedway to obliteration that
literally takes one’s breath away! Never before has impending cataclysm been on
such a rapid ascent as the 21st century.
On the other
hand, who really believes it (“extinction”) will happen? Answer: Almost nobody
believes it. As for the world at large, the “big it” isn’t remotely possible.
All of which makes Bendell’s essay and monologue so intriguing and compelling
as an alternative viewpoint. He embraces the “what if the worst-case scenario”
really (surprise, surprise) happens?
Meantime, as
things stand today, the world has come to its senses about the relentless
severe dangers inherent within excessive CO2 emitted by power plants, cars,
trucks, and planes. After all, greenhouse gases cumulate in the stratosphere,
similar to layers of heavy woolen blankets, which, in turn, traps global heat
which otherwise would escape into outer space, but no, it’s trapped.
Assuredly,
excessive greenhouse gases with concomitant global warming compelled a
gathering of nations at Paris 2015 in agreement to limit global warming to
1.5-2.0C?
But honestly,
come on now! Are humans omnipotent enough to “control the climate” to +1.5-2.0C
from baseline post-industrial without unintended blow-back and/or f/ups of major
proportions? Is it really so simple? Answer: No.
Some
knowledgeable sources claim it’ll be 10-20 years, or more, before technology is
perfected and fully implemented to alter human-caused climate damage with any
degree of proficiency, but that presumes an engineered concept sizeable enough
in-scale to do the trick, which is the bane of on-going geoengineering efforts.
Although,
eleventh-hour rescues seldom succeed within enough time.
Already, the
Paris 2015 climate accord is poignant proof that the world recognizes the
dangers of abrupt climate change and a lot of very smart people are scared as
hell! Still, the problem remains: Nobody seems to know what to do other than
theorize, experiment and talk, which is notoriously cheap.
As it
happens, nothing of major consequence is being done to stop an extinction
event. As of today, fossil fuels emitting CO2 remain at 80-85% of energy
consumption (Source: U.S. EIA, Washington, D.C.) the same as 50 years ago.
Nothing positive has happened for decades!
Come to think
of it, is it really too late?
Yes,
according to Bendell, it is too late. He carefully reviewed the scientific
literature as well as accessing research institutions to get to the bottom of
the current status of climate change. What he discovered is basic to his
conviction that society is headed for a train wreck of enormous proportions.
Deep
Adaptation offers examples of likely outcomes, to wit: “With the power down,
soon you wouldn’t have water coming out of your tap. You will depend upon your
neighbours for food and some warmth. You will become malnourished. You won’t
know whether to stay or go.
You will fear being violently killed before starving
to death.”
Professor
Bendell concludes: “Disruptive impacts from climate change are now inevitable.
Geoengineering is likely to be ineffective or counter-productive. Therefore,
the mainstream climate policy community now recognizes the need to work much
more on adaptation to the effects of climate change… Societies will experience
disruptions to their basic functioning within less than ten years due to
climate stress. Such disruptions include increased levels of malnutrition,
starvation, disease, civil conflict and war – and will not avoid affluent
nations.”
It goes
without saying Bendell’s contention may or may not play out accordingly. And in
sharp contrast to his forlorn viewpoint, human ingenuity has been a powerful
force over millennia and hopefully comes to the rescue. But then again, it’s
human ingenuity that got into this mess in the first place.
Is it too
late?
Ecosystems
are already starting to crumble where no people live so nobody sees it.
Meanwhile, a lot of very smart well-informed people are scared as hell, but
hush-hushed. Indeed, a few scientists, but very few public voices, believe
society is fast approaching “lights out.” It’s why Jem Bendell wrote Deep
Adaptation.
Postscript:The
Australian Bureau of Meteorology said mid -January 2019 marked the hottest days
on record. Authorities are blaming the pounding heat wave for massive die-offs
of bats on biblical scale and fish, as well as farms with “fruit still on the
trees cooked from the inside out.” Ominous? Oh, Yes!
The PIOMAS Arctic sea ice minimum will reach zero in 2024, when before it was 2022. So it could slip forward again. However, many don't think it has to reach the zero point for warm water intrusion at the shelf depth of 50 meters over 1500GTs of methane hydrate. The idea being that increase in temperature of just 2*F or several pounds of seismic or kinetic sympathetic energy will cause it to suddenly expand 170 times in volume and reach the surface as very large fountains. The seaswere reported to be "boiling" with loss of buoyancy bt Alaskan Yupik fishermen in 2016 and a sea expedition of the Russians the same year reported hundreds of up to 1 km wide methane fountains, to the Siberian Times. Previously they had been much smaller and in lesser numbers. Latent heat when the sea ice is gone is thought to work fast, probably within a year to warm the deposits into mass release in a positive feedback loop going up exponentially. Enough to raise northern hemisphere temperatures 1*F per year until killing food crops (at +3*F), increased flooding, wet bulb events, and increasing forest fires. A six to 30 month lag to the southern hemisphere. Extinction of surface life comes at +10*F from 1750 pre-industrial global temperature, and we are already at +4*F with half masked by soots of combustion, increased humidity contrails with 50% more flights than 2000, and purposely enhanced contrails since 1997 in a multi-national secret program for business as usual until the ultra rich escape to their underground stocked and powered fortresses and cities in an attempt to outlast a 2 million year geologic event. The first 100+K years with global reflective cloud cover and continuous violent global storms and ignition of deeper and deeper methane deposits. There is the problem of safe shutdown of all the Gens 1 through 3 nuclear reactors and safe storage of wastes, fuel rods and weapons. After that for a short time there is the ocean cooling to refreeze the Arctic ice cover on the hydrates before the positive feedback loop is completed by an artificial aerosol event from buried nekes and sufate ores on top, for a global winter long enough, that would also starve surface humans and put trees in dormancy with other plants and some animas. Other species would need care underground. The survivors would have to build a hundred thousand or more factories that convert CO2 into carbonate, thousands of drones to replant trillions of trees, and OMTEC refrigeration units in the oceans enough to keep them cool until the CO2 level of less than 350 ppm is reached or better yet 300ppm, in several hundred years. A bottleneck being preferable to a worse than Permian Great Dying type ELE. Those survivors would also have to ensure the attitude of non-replenishment, greed, lust, jealousy, and sloth never happen again with a moral and spiritual change. Of course, that is only a possibility. The greater probability is a recovery of full diversity of species longer than the 50 million years of the Permian End.
ReplyDeleteextinction of humans seems unlikely, though certainly there will be massive suffering and deaths of humans, animals and plants from climate change. why not human extinction? because when the majority have died, there will be less carbon released and other species will increase. (a little ice age followed the mass deaths of N American Indians due to European invasion; forests recovered). dystopia for humans, yes. Exrinction - probably not.
ReplyDeletePeople need to know about The Purple Non-Sulfur Photosynthetic Bacteria.
ReplyDeleteI keep hearing that the methane feedback from exposed permafrost will accelerate the end of times, yet we have a stable bacteria that can manage that and seems to propagate to satisft demand.
Is this a known bacteria by many in climate research?
I don't know, but it sounds of interest.
Delete"Come to think of it, is it really too late?"
ReplyDeleteIt appears to be the case?
"the problem is that carbon
00:35 dioxide which is the main human cause
00:39 greenhouse gas that's contributing to
00:41 the global warming lasts a really long
00:43 time in the atmosphere on the order of
00:45 hundreds of years so the carbon dioxide
00:48 that we've already put in the atmosphere
00:50 we really haven't seen there was the
00:53 full response of the climate system to
00:55 all that extra carbon dioxide yet . . . "
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJDxdwlCrvA&t=3s&fbclid=IwAR3nyRw8UY89nWBAql-yIdtAPjp6xlXkgeA1g8cT15v_CGaHjFRwvMrsAjo