There is much
speculation in political circles, especially on the left, about what effect the
pandemic will have on our politics, once we get through the current crisis.
Certainly, these are unprecedented times that we live it, which business as
usual politics was unable to cope with, in any kind of civilised manner. It is
at times like these that government comes into its own, laissez-faire,
neo-liberal politics has been found wanting, and a collective politics has
emerged as a much more suitable vehicle for this crisis, in the UK at least.
The do nothing
strategy, if you can call it that, to contain the spread of the virus, has
steadily been abandoned over the last fortnight, in favour of a
collective appeal to help the NHS, by most people largely self isolating, and the closure of pubs, restaurants and live entertainment of all kinds. Gradually,
the instructions from the government have become more draconian, with
enforcement by the police of these measures.
The political
left (and some on the right) has voiced concerns over this more authoritarian approach,
whilst the political right worries over ‘big state’ actions and to some extent
carries over its obsession with immigration from the Brexit debate. Ah, Brexit,
it hardly gets a mention these days though, after almost four years of it
dominating British political discourse. The main concern for the right appears
to be the adoption, by a Conservative government, and a pretty right-wing one
at that, of socialist policies.
The government
has, in effect, nationalised the payroll, with measures to pay 80% of public
and private sector wages for those laid off by the crisis and has produced a
similar scheme for the self-employed. At the same time, a volunteer pool of
people has been established to help the NHS and to take on other duties, like
driving food delivery vans and doing shopping for elderly and vulnerable
people.
Some of this
was already happening in communities anyway, but the government is accelerating
this, with a call for collectivism rather than the usual individualism, bugger
everyone else, me, me, me, being replaced by a more sharing approach.
Some businesses
will go bankrupt, but many will survive, and some will even do very well out of
this emergency, as Naomi Klein has documented in her book about disaster capitalism, ‘The Shock Doctrine’.
What we are
witnessing here, is an attempt to save the capitalist system, rather than
replace it, but for the neo-liberal Conservative party, this is indeed a big
shift to the left, but of a Keynesian nature, rather than a truly socialist
one, but even so this is very much out of character for the Tories.
This is an
emergency though, so the attempt will be to move back to business as usual as
soon as the crisis is under control. The Tories hope this will be greeted with relief by the public, after the lock-down has ended. The government are trying to conflate our
freedoms with the normal state of economics and politics, hoping that people
will be so relieved that they can go out and enjoy themselves, they will
welcome the resumption of the ancient regime.
The government’s
favoured analogy is that of fighting a war, when a national effort is needed to
defeat the ‘enemy’, all pulling together (collectively) in this time of crisis.
Indeed during in World War II, Britain came as close to socialism as it has
ever done. And it was successful, but people tired of all the restrictions and
particularly the rationing of food, once the war was over, and this is the feeling
that the Tories will attempt to exploit.
And yet,
Winston Churchill, the great wartime leader tried exactly the same tactic, but
was unceremoniously booted out of office, and Labour had a landslide victory.
People remembered what life was like before the war, and remembered Churchill’s
politics from that time. He set the army against union members in the General
Strike of 1926 and was no friend of the working classes.
The people
wanted no more of that, and after all the sacrifice of the war years, wanted a
decisive break with the pre-war days. I doubt the soldiers would have obeyed
Churchill if he had tried to set them against the workers at that time.
The 1945 Labour
government although it did great things like create the NHS and largely the
welfare state, underestimated the public’s fatigue with wartime measures, and
carried on rationing for too long after the war ended, which ultimately led to
electoral defeat in 1951, and the return of a Tory government. Although, not of
the pre-war type, as they outdid Labour on things like building council houses. The post-war politics remained in place under successive Tory and Labour
governments until Margaret Thatcher destroyed it in the 1980s.
For the left,
this lesson needs to be learnt, we should big up the achievements of the
collective approach, and the improvements in the environment (far less
pollution) but without keeping the most unpopular bits, like the draconian
approach to people not being able to have fun. Once the coronavirus pandemic
has passed, we should ask people if they really want to go back to austerity for most, and
extreme wealth for a few?
Everything will be in play once the crisis is over, there will be a new world to fight for.
"we should ask people if they really want to go back to austerity for most, and extreme wealth for a few". Well, given that such a situation is exactly what the electorate has voted for every time they've been asked since May 1979, I see no reason for it not to continue.
ReplyDeletethat was also true before WWII, which is why I have included the comparison.
Delete