A review of two books about ecosocialism.
Facing the Apocalypse: Arguments for Ecosocialism
by Alan Thornett
Resistance Books, 2019
by Alan Thornett
Resistance Books, 2019
Eco-Socialism
for Now and the Future: Practical Utopias and Rational Action
by Robert Albritton
Palgrave Macmillan, 2019
by Robert Albritton
Palgrave Macmillan, 2019
Eco-socialism
has been a topic addressed by an increasing number of books in recent years.
2019 has already witnessed the addition of two books to the body of literature.
In Facing the Apocalypse, Alan Thornett, a former trade union
activist in the British automobile industry during the 1960s and 1970s, has
written a readable and engaging argument for the need to turn to eco-socialism
as a strategy to mitigate climate change. He supports the Red Green Labour network,
an eco-socialist current within the Labour Party. Conversely, in Eco-Socialism
for Now and the Future, the prolific political economist Robert
Albritton, a professor emeritus at York University in Toronto, provides a
detailed litany of the short-comings of the capitalist world system, but has
far less to say about eco-socialism per se than the former.
Facing the
apocalypse
The key
motivating factor for Thornett in Facing the Apocalypse is his
opinion that the left’s record on the environment has been ‘bleak’. Thornett
laments that most left organizations across the world, including socialist and
Marxist groups, give scant attention to the ecological crisis, often arguing
that they have many other demands upon them. Thornett’s stated aim is to
provoke discussion about strategies which will better enable the left to play a
positive role in the current struggle to avert ecological apocalypse.
He begins
by covering a lot of material that will be familiar to eco-socialists, namely
on planetary boundaries; water issues, agriculture, biofuel production, and
urban water consumption; pollution, such as oceanic dead zones, air pollution,
and plastic waste; and the 6th extinction of species, which is
essential reading for leftists not as familiar with these topics.
Turning to
how the left can begin to make sense of these issues, Thornett provides an
excellent overview of the ecological legacy of both classical Marxism, as
exemplified in the work of Marx, Engels, William Morris, and Edward Carpenter,
and later leftist thinkers concerned with the ecological crisis, including
Scott Nearing, Murray Bookchin, Rachel Carson, Roderick Frazier Nash, Barry
Commoner, Raymond Williams and Derek Wall.
Shifting to the Global South, he
also discusses the indigenous struggle for environmental sustainability as
highlighted by the work of Hugo Blanco in Peru, Vandana Shiva in India, and
Chico Mendes and Sister Dorothy Stag in Brazil. While the term eco-socialism
has only appeared over the course of the past 35 years or so, Thornett makes it
clear that eco-socialism draws from a line of thinkers extending back to Marx
himself.
In his analysis
of the efforts that have been made to address the climate change crisis thus
far, Thornett juxtaposes conventional and Global South approaches. In the case
of the former, he argues that the Paris Agreement was ‘deeply flawed’ in
various ways, particularly in that it ‘was based on non-legally binding pledges
to reduce remissions’ (pp. 78-29).
Nevertheless, while he acknowledges that the
Paris Agreement operates within capitalist parameters, he maintains it provides
a ‘new dynamic from which a new round (or stage) for the struggle could be
launched’ (p.82). In my view this is a little too optimistic. I tend to view the
Paris Agreement as a distraction, creating the false sense that the
powers-that-be now take climate change seriously. Various analysts have argued
that even if all countries were to meet their voluntary reduction targets, the
climate is still slated to rise by 2.7 to 3.5 degrees Celsius by 2100.
As such,
the Paris Agreement fails to carry on the spirit of the 2010 Peoples’
Conference on Climate Change and the Rights of Mother Earth drafted in
Cochabamba, Bolivia, which was led by indigenous people and recognized the role
of global capitalism in exploiting nature, thus contributing to the ecological
crisis and climate change. Unfortunately, to date, there appears to be no clear
indications that either the earlier People’s Conference resolutions or the 2015
Paris Agreement have significantly reversed an on-going increase in greenhouse
gas emissions, let alone mount a serious challenge to the growth paradigm of
global capitalism that drives this increase.
After laying
his foundations by summarizing the various facets of the environmental crisis
and laying out the basis for a Marxist position on ecology, Thornett moves on
to assessing recent attempts that have been made to further eco-socialism as a
political project. The book discusses various eco-socialist developments, but
particularly focusses upon the Ecosocialist International Network (EIN), which
served as the platform for an eco-socialist manifesto drafted by Michael Lowy
and the late Joel Kovel in 2001. He laments that the EIN ‘has failed to make
progress in recent years, and eco-socialism remains a minority position on the
radical left today’ (p. 92).
Nevertheless, some European parties define
themselves as eco-socialist, including the Red-Green Alliance in Denmark, the
Left Bloc in Portugal, the Socialist Left Party in Norway, and the Parti de
Gauche in France. From my position in Australia, I would also note that the
Socialist Alliance, a small party in Australia, defines itself as eco-socialist
and publishes the Green Left Weekly newspaper. Conversely, Socialist
Alternative, the largest socialist group in Australia, does not define itself
as eco-socialist. Ringing true in relation to my own national experience,
Thornett’s argument that too many socialists continue to ignore or at least
downplay the environmental devastation created by capitalism, choosing to focus
on exclusively on its exploitation of the working class, is a compelling one.
Turning to the
question of ‘what is to be done’ if these eco-socialist currents are to have a
greater impact, Thornett draws attention to various matters that need to be
urgently addressed, including the need to develop a strategy that forces
capitalism to ‘make major change in the course of the long struggle for
socialism’ (p. 100), whether carbon taxes can serve as a radical transitional
reform, the Stalinist legacy vis-à-vis environmental degradation, and
population growth, with the latter being a contested issue on the far left.
While carbon taxes are in my view preferable to emissions trading schemes, thus
far most countries that have implemented them, particularly the Scandinavian
ones, have not established particularly high carbon prices that have resulted
in significant reductions in emissions. In his analysis of population growth,
which he defines as an ecofeminist concern, Thornett argues that the
‘stabilisation of the global human populations would create a better basis on
which to tackle the ecological crisis’ (p. 161-162).
Any effort to reduce
population growth would have to address two issues: (1) improving the overall
standard of living among the poorest people in the world, which would require
creating an even playing field, and reducing the wealth of the affluent sectors
of both developed and developing countries and (2) empowering women and girls
by challenging patriarchy on all fronts, including in religious institutions.
When considering Thornett’s emphasis on the need to address the Stalinist
legacy of environmental degradation, it is clear that we must acknowledge that
the Soviet bloc countries were forced to play catch-up with developed
capitalist countries, particularly the United States, in the context of the
Cold War.
I personally witnessed this first hand during my stint as a Fulbright
Lecturer in the German Democratic Republic, a country which relied on lignite
coal for energy production due to short supply of alternative sources.
Therefore, it is essential that those who take-on Thornett’s call to challenge
Stalinist legacies take note of the much changed international context we face
today.
In his
concluding chapters of the book, Thornett provides an assessment of the
environmental struggle in Britain. Notably he praises the progress the Labour
Party has made under the leadership of Jeremy Corbyn, which has pledged support
for the Paris Agreement, a new clean air act, banning fracking, renationalizing
Britain’s energy system, and promoting a renewables industry with unionized
labor.
Hopefully, however, eco-socialists within the Labour Party can push it
beyond a largely ecological modernization agenda that can be incorporated
within a green capitalist framework. He appeals to the left, given the gravity
of the ecological and climate crises, to ‘become far more engaged with the
environmental struggle’ (p. 222). I could not agree more.
Eco-socialism
for now and the future
Albritton’s
book is worthwhile reading because it provides us with a detailed litany of the
short-comings of the capitalist world system that warrant contemplating an
eco-socialist alternative. He reports that the earliest usage of the term eco-socialism may
harken back to a pamphlet titled Eco-Socialism in a Nutshell published
in 1980 in Britain by the Socialist Environment and Resources Association. Albritton
argues that ‘since the publication of this pamphlet, ‘eco-socialism’ has come
to be seen by large numbers of people as the theoretical and action concept
most appropriate for mobilizing against capitalism in the twenty-first century’
(p. 5).
One of
Albritton’s key aims in his book is to promote ‘practical utopias’ to
conceptualize changes that are seen as desirable but may also seem too global
or too difficult to achieve without a very distant time frame (i.e. hopefully
less than a century for the more difficult changes) (p. 23). Unfortunately, he fails
to acknowledge an earlier book that is highly relevant in this regard: Envisioning Real Utopias (2010) by the late
sociologist Erik Olin Wright, in which he defines ‘real utopias’ as visions
that are achievable through much theorizing and social experimentation and
provides numerous examples of real utopias.
Albritton
observes that while capitalism is the source of numerous crises, he asserts
that the ‘greatest crises that we now face are primarily ecological’, and that
‘for the most part, capitalism cannot deal with ecological crises in an
effective way’ (p. 42). He calls for an ethics of caring for both humanity and
the eco-system, noting that a good educational system can play a key role in
promoting ethical behavior, including in terms of dealing with ‘democracy,
social justice, equality, climate change, cooperation, generosity, citizenship,
openness to diversity, or caring for the earth’s inhabitants and bio-systems’
(p. 49).
In contrast to
communism, socialism as a transitional stage would still entail some
differential material reward structure. Albritton suggests that possibly a
‘ratio of highest income to lowest of four to one might be justified, but such
a ratio would need to be debated’ (p. 67). He recommends several gradual
approaches for redistributing wealth, including raising taxes for the rich,
shortening the work day, lowering the cost of basic necessities (or even making
them free), extending education and training, and eliminating tax dodging, tax
loopholes, and tax havens.
Although Albritton’s catalogue of practical utopian
reforms seem desirable, they have plainly been thought out with application to
developed capitalist countries in mind. In contrast, the book does not
spell out how such measures might apply to developing countries or how to
resolve the inequalities existing between developed and developing societies.
While Albritton
recognizes that the problems that humanity faces must be addressed at many
levels, ranging from local to global, he nevertheless acknowledges that overall
‘it is easier to start locally and build up’ (p. 121). Unfortunately, he does
not touch in detail upon the role of anti-systemic movements and radical political
parties in contributing to such a process. In my view, coordinating the efforts
of a wide array of anti-systemic movements, and in a sense create a global
meta-movement that seeks to achieve social justice and parity, democratic
processes, environmental sustainability, and a safe climate, is vitally
important.
This is especially so when we can observe that even when radical
political parties come to power, as we have seen in recent times under the
guise of the Bolivarian Revolution in Venezuela, Ecuador, and Bolivia and
Syriza in Greece, they face incredible opposition both internally, from local
elites and even middle-class people, and externally from hegemonic powers,
ranging from multi-national corporations to the United States to the European
Central Bank and the International Monetary Fund.
Beyond green
capitalism
As a long-time
eco-socialist who has worked on environmental issues for some time, including
climate change since 2005, I find both Facing the Apocalypse and Eco-Socialism
for Now and the Future to be engaging and readable books accessible to
both academics and social activists. Thornett’s book provides us with valuable
information on efforts to promote eco-socialism within the British Labour
Party, something which has not happened to its rough counterpart in the United
States, the Democratic Party, even on the part of Bernie Sanders.
Sadly, in Australia the Australian Labor Party, which lost the recent federal election, is completely clueless of an eco-socialist agenda and the leadership of the Greens are resistant to it, even if some of its members are eco-socialists or ‘water melons’ (green on the outside, red on the inside).
Sadly, in Australia the Australian Labor Party, which lost the recent federal election, is completely clueless of an eco-socialist agenda and the leadership of the Greens are resistant to it, even if some of its members are eco-socialists or ‘water melons’ (green on the outside, red on the inside).
Albritton’s book
makes some valuable suggestions for system-challenging transitional reforms
that could pave the way to eco-socialism. I welcome both books to the growing
literature on eco-socialism, a space to which both academics and activists
continue to add, in a time when it becomes increasingly apparent that green
capitalist and green social democratic proposals are insufficient to contain
the ecological and climatic crises and address social justice issues.
Humanity faces two overarching imperatives which are intricately interwoven, how do we live in harmony with each other and how do we live in harmony with our fragile eco-system. The more difficult task is how to go from the existing capitalist world system to an eco-socialist one.
Humanity faces two overarching imperatives which are intricately interwoven, how do we live in harmony with each other and how do we live in harmony with our fragile eco-system. The more difficult task is how to go from the existing capitalist world system to an eco-socialist one.
Hans A Baer is
based at the at the University of Melbourne. He has published on a diversity of
research topics, including Mormonism, African-American religion,
socio-political life in East Germany, critical health anthropology, and
Australian climate politics. Baer’s most recent books include Global Warming and the Political Ecology
of Health (with Merrill Singer, Left Coast Press, 2009), Global
Capitalism and Climate Change (AltaMira, 2012), Climate
Politics and the Climate Movement in Australia (with Verity Burgmann,
Melbourne University Press, 2012), The Anthropology of Climate Change (with
Merrill Singer, Routledge, 2014; 2nd edition, 2018), Democratic
Eco-Socialism as a Real Utopia (Berghahn Books, 2018).
No comments:
Post a Comment