The decision, taken locally but heavily influenced by the
Green Party leadership, of the party not standing a candidate in this Thursday’s
Richmond Park by-election, appears to signal a change in the political
priorities for the English Greens.
To recap, the by-election has been called because the
sitting Tory MP, Zac Goldsmith, resigned from his party and is standing as an
independent, anti-Heathrow Airport expansion
candidate. Goldsmith, although having something of an ecological viewpoint, is
not necessarily against airport expansion in general, but he is against it in
his own back yard.
The Lib Dem candidate Sarah Olney, also backs airport
expansion, but not at Heathrow, whilst the Labour candidate, Christian Wolmar
takes the same position, preferring Gatwick Airport for an extra runway.
One might have thought that the Greens would seize on this
opportunity to differentiate themselves from the other parties and use the
by-election to publicise the urgency of action on climate change, and the part
that air travel plays in exacerbating the problem.
The first indications were that this was indeed going to be the
case, with a candidate selected to stand, but a change of heart by that
candidate, and some other activists locally, saw the decision reversed. This
was after representations were made by the Green Party co-leaders, Caroline
Lucas and Jonathan Bartley.
There has been more emphasis in recent years on the Green
Party’s social as well as environmental policies, but I can’t ever remember
environmental policy, and in particular those policies around climate change, being
relegated to a subordinate status like has happened with this by-election.
The Lib Dems, hardly surprisingly given their modus
operandi, are using the Heathrow expansion issue in the classic nimbyist way,
but they have also tried desperately to make the by-election about a completely
different subject. Brexit.
I suppose this should come as no great surprise to
seasoned Lib Dem watchers, as trying
to thwart the Brexit process is now their flag-ship policy, as they try to
recover from their near wipe out at last year’s general election. They see
an opportunity to tempt some of the 16 million Remain voters into supporting the Lib
Dems, particularly as the Tories (and probably Labour too, although it is not
clear yet), do not want to re-run the referendum on our membership of the EU.
Green Party members and voters were overwhelmingly in favour
of remaining in the EU, as I was, but there was a minority who wanted to leave.
Green Left comrade, Larry O’Hara made the case for Greens
to vote to leave the EU eloquently on this blog prior to the referendum.
Larry makes a strong case for Greens to abide by their principles and take the
opportunity to bring democratic decision making to its lowest, local level. But
as I say, most Greens, in some cases reluctantly, voted to stay.
This was
pretty much my view, seeing staying as the lesser of evils, rather than let the
Tories dismantle environmental and employment protection policies.
I wonder how many Green remainers though, put EU membership
or some kind of associate membership above the issue of airport expansion and
climate change? I dare say that some Greens will say that staying in the EU
will better enable us to deal with climate issues, but that is a matter of
opinion.
Of course the decision not to stand in Richmond Park is all
bound up with the idea, promoted by the Green Party’s new co-leaders, to make a
start on the formation of a progressive alliance, of political parties vaguely
to the left of the Tories. Labour are standing though in Richmond Park, and a progressive
alliance does not yet exist in any real way.
I am broadly in favour of an anti-Tory alliance for the next
general election, but I do think that we Greens have missed an opportunity to trumpet
our distinctive position on airport expansion and the issues surrounding it, in this by-election.
Not all Green Party members are happy about the position we
have taken in Richmond Park, and I must admit that I am uneasy about using this
by-election as a referendum on Brexit, or the terms of it. I also have the
feeling that we may be being used as the Lib Dem's useful idiots.
Sadly, Mike I agree with you regarding the EU issue being most important for the leadership. They have been drawn into the Westminster bubble/media agenda, prioritising allying with the failed political elite rather than the popular will. The Lib dems of course are contemptible as they always have been, and supporting them is an utter disgrace. Now they are in the political gutter where they belong we should have been stamping on their throat: any party with serious aspirations for principled power would do that. A party in awe of the cult of Caroline will not.
ReplyDeleteIt was a poor decision not to stand, especially if, as seems to be the case the greens asked for and got nothing for giving the ld's a clear run. the case for no airport expansion and building an economy based on low carbon should have been put.
ReplyDeletethis is hardly demcratic there more or less trying to force people to vote libdem. whatever the outcome im hoping the libdems dont win the seat.
ReplyDelete