We are, probably, over three years away from the next
general election, scheduled under the Fixed Term Parliament Act to be in 2020.
But, nothing surprises in politics these days, and the election could come a
lot sooner than that, but either way, the Tories look nailed on to win it.
The opinion polls
give the Tories a 12 to 14 point lead over Labour, pretty much universally,
and although we have seen the polls getting things wrong recently, not by a
double digit margin. There must be something right about these polls, and
intuitively, I feel they are quite accurate. The split in the Parliamentary Labour
Party, pro and anti Jeremy Corbyn, of course hinders Labour and aids the Tories, and
this looks set to continue up until the general election.
Then we have the probable changes to the Parliamentary
constituencies and reduction in the number of MPs, which overwhelmingly favours
the Tories, by increasing their representation by 20 to 30 seats at the
expense, mainly, of Labour. Even if anti-Corbyn MPs are replaced, they could stand as spoiler independent candidates in their old seats.
In Scotland, Corbyn’s leadership has made no notable
difference to his party’s unpopularity, and it looks as though the SNP will retain
most of the seats they won in 2015, when Labour was rduced to a singular MP, north
of the border.
A progressive alliance, which has been mooted for the next
general election, really an anti-Tory alliance, would make it more difficult
for the Tories to win, but Labour shows little sign of making this a reality.
Even if they did, I think the Tories would probably still win anyway.
A hell of a lot can happen in politics in three years, to
paraphrase Harold Wilson, but the prospects of the Tories not winning, are, I
think, minimal from this distance out. The one issue that could turn this
situation around, is Brexit. The biggest single issue in UK politics at the
moment, like it or loathe it, does offer some encouragement though.
Wednesday’s Autumn Statement by the Chancellor of the
Exchequer, Philip Hammond, reveals the economic perils of Brexit, despite what
the Brexiteers have been saying about this being a falsely gloomy picture, and
really everything will be fine.
The independent Office
of Budget Responsibility (OBR), says that Brexit will reduce growth in the
UK economy over the next few years, and estimate the fall in tax receipts this
will cause, amounts to an extra £60 billion black hole in the UK’s finances up until 2020.
Which means, less money for public services, increased taxes, more welfare cuts
and more borrowing by the government. More austerity.
The think-tank the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), warn
of the biggest squeeze on pay for 70 years over Brexit, with rising
inflation meaning that wages will not have recovered to their 2008 level before the
global financial crisis hit, by 2021. What’s more, it will be low and
middle-income households who feel the pinch the most.
The idea that Britain will get everything it wants, access
to the European Single Market and opting out of the free movement of people,
from the European Union (EU) is for the birds. Primarily, it will not be economic
policy that determines the EU response in negotiations, but as always with the
EU, it will be politics. There is no way the EU will want to reward the UK for
leaving the club, whatever beneficial case is made by Britain to the EU, along
economic lines. The EU will not have it, full stop.
All of which leaves the Tory government with no sort of
negotiating position, other than compensating some British based businesses for
paying tariffs on trade in the EU, and more than likely a slashing of corporation
tax at home to businesses generally. This will lead to even higher inflation than that already
caused by a devalued pound and less tax revenue for the UK. In short, this will
make the economic situation even worse.
So, a good chance that the Tories will make a bad job of
Brexit, and maybe Labour can unify themselves to take advantage of the open
goal left for them by the government. Or maybe not?
The next UK general election will probably be the most stark
left-wing party versus right-wing party since 1983, and perhaps even more so.
Of course, 1983 saw a landslide Tory victory, but the situation now is very
different, and strange election results are becoming commonplace. Although,
mainly to the advantage of the far right, so far.
But there is one big caveat on this. We will probably leave
the EU in 2019, and by 2020, the full economic picture will not have played out
by then. The voters seem to have scant regard for ‘expert’ opinions these days,
and until they really do feel it financially, may very well refuse to believe
the dire predictions for the future. They also will not realise that
immigration will not fall much, if at all, but immediately after Brexit be satisfied
enough on the matter.
If the Tories do win in 2020, then the next opportunity to defeat them will
be 2025, and Corbyn in all probability will not be the leader of the Labour
Party by then. And someone else with similar political ideas might not be able to get
enough support from Labour MPs, to get onto the leadership ballot.
I must admit, I’m not too hopeful.
What evidence do you have for the assertion that, in the event of a progressive alliance, "the Tories would probably win anyway"?
ReplyDeleteThis looks like a proposition unsupported by any facts or logic. If a progressive alliance was done properly it could succeed. Let us remember: the Tories won just 36.9% of the popular vote in 2015. By 2020 we will have had a decade of fruitless austerity which will leave the deficit largely untouched.
The Tories can be beaten, but we need to get the electoral system working for us, not against us.
My feeling is that the English will not buy a PA with the SNP, it drew them to the Tories last time. I may be wrong, of course, but you can't tell me that the portents are good.
ReplyDeleteOh great! so the sum total of our chances of any kind of win over the ruling classes is limited to their rigged electoral cycle? Might as well give up on politics and start prepping and that isn't a flippant suggestion. May I suggest that in future we factor in what we can pro-actively do to influence these processes?
ReplyDeleteIt's just a comment on electoral politics at the moment, a bit longer than my usual posts. Of course there is a wider politics, perhaps you can have an input, too?
ReplyDelete