The Lib Dems could have ended this coalition government at any time in the past five years, so we must assume that they have been broadly happy with the policies that have been pursued. So, I looked through their manifesto for the 2010 general election in search of policies which they stood on, and have managed to deliver.
There is a whole raft of policies in the manifesto, but I
failed to find much in the way of policies successfully implemented. Here are
the meagre pickings that I have found:
Tax-free earning threshold to rise to £10,000, paid for by a
"mansion tax" of 1% on properties worth over £2m applicable to value
of property over that figure
Well the Lib Dems didn’t get their mansion tax to pay for
this, but the tax free earning threshold has indeed been raised to £10,000. To
pay for this in the absence of a mansion tax they have cut spending on public
services and made cuts to working tax credits. The effect of this policy is to
benefit higher earners, when cuts to tax credits are factored in, the lower
paid are worse off.
Cap pay rises at £400 for all public sector workers, initially for two
years
Plenty of the public sector work-force has been lucky to get
£400 a year pay rises, with pay freezes or 1% increases at a time when
inflation was running at well above 1%. On top of this, public sector workers
have had their pension contributions raised meaning that their take home pay is
reduced further. And these are the lucky ones who have not been made redundant.
Integrate health and social care, allow people to stay in homes for
longer rather than going into hospital or residential care by limiting
bureaucracy [England only]
This is gradually being introduced by the government with
responsibility for health and social care passing to local authorities. Some
finance has been transferred from the NHS budget, but nearly all councils,
including Tory and Lib Dem run ones, say the money is not enough. The Local
Government Association forecasts a crisis in social care provision unless £5 billion
of more money can be found to fund these services.
Introduce single transferrable vote system, cut number of MPs by 150
and introduce fixed-term parliaments
Fixed term parliaments have been introduced, although that
was more to do with not allowing the prime minister to choose the date of the
election that was most unfavourable to the Lib Dems, than any constitutional
necessity. We didn’t get STV voting, but we did get a referendum on the
Alternative Vote electoral system, which is less democratic than STV, but the
referendum was lost massively anyway. No reduction in MPs.
Split up Royal Mail and Post Office, keeping latter in public
ownership. Sell off 49% of Royal Mail, dividing rest between government and
employee trust
Royal Mail was indeed fully privatised and at a knock down
price, probably about one billion pounds under the market value, so the wealthy
made a killing buying and selling the shares at a time when public services
were being slashed. A profitable publicly owned service now in private hands on
the cheap.
Reform regional development agencies, transferring more power over
economic development to councils [England only]
This has happened with Local Enterprise Partnerships (LEPs) replacing Regional Development Agencies. These LEPs are a partnership between
local authorities and private businesses in regionally geographical areas. The
purpose is to grow local economies, but this has scarcely worked at all, with
growth outside of the private housing market very modest indeed. Of course,
local authorities have had their funding cut by around 40% at the same time so
it is hardly a surprise that LEPs have failed to deliver.
So, as far as achievements go then, not much for the Lib
Dems to shout about? They say that their part in the austerity economic
measures have paid dividends, as do the Tories, but there is flimsy evidence to
support this. They also say that they have reined in the Tories on many
policies, and there may be a small amount of truth in this. But it looks to me
as though the Tories have got pretty much what they wanted, with the exception of
stopping them gerrymandering the electoral boundaries in their favour.
All the ‘successes’ mentioned above have been largely
supported by the Tories, so I have to conclude that the Lib Dems have next to
nothing to show for their five years in government, except becoming very
unpopular with the voters.
No comments:
Post a Comment