As British government ministers start to make the case to
MPs for the Royal Air Force to bomb Islamic State (IS) targets in Syria, opinion
polls suggest that the British public are wary of the benefits of such action.
A poll by Survation,
where 1546 people were surveyed (and on Britain’s continuing membership of the
European Union), shows the public to be less than enthusiastic, to say the
least, about extending air strikes on IS in Syria. The poll was conducted in the
aftermath of the Paris atrocities on 16 and 17 November.
56% say that the bombing of IS so far has made the UK less
safe, with only 18% saying that the action had made the country safer.
When asked which option the public believe would be the best
way to combat the threat posed by IS, only 15% believe that the UK, like France
should independently launch airstrikes on IS targets immediately, only slightly
higher than those (13%) who say the UK should stay away from the situation
completely. A majority (52%) would support a more measured, multilateral
response, military or otherwise, backed by a UN resolution.
These figures indicate that if MPs do go along with the
government’s desire to engage in air strikes in Syria, they will not be
supported by a large section of the public. It could well be that the British
people are understandably nervous in the wake of the Paris attacks, but they
have also witnessed the counter productive nature of recent similar
interventions in Iraq and Libya.
Another opinion poll by BMG Research for the London
Evening Standard again after the Paris attacks found a significant shift in
favour of bombing raids in Syria though, but still showed an even 50/50 split over the
proposed action.
Half the public thought the bombing raids being carried out in
Iraq should be extended to IS heartlands in Syria. The same proportion did not.
Opposition was higher among women (56 per cent) and those aged 18 to 24 (64 per
cent). The momentum though is towards backing the air strikes say BMG.
MPs are believed to be coming around as well, to authorising
bombing raids in Syria, after failing to endorse the move in 2014 (when the
Assad regime would have been the target).
The Labour leadership will probably oppose extending the
campaign into Syria, but many Labour MPs are said to be supportive of the
government and there are not many Tory MP dissenters. The Scottish National
Party and Democratic Unionists Party MPs have also said they will consider
exactly what the government puts forward in an open minded way.
What seems to have changed MP’s mind is not just the scale
and horror of the Paris attacks but that because one of our closest allies has
been attacked on its home soil, a response would be more like self defence from
Britain’s point of view.
Air raids on IS are not going to bring about its demise,
which will need ground forces to dislodge them from the land they hold at the
moment. This I think, would not be popular at all with the public or MPs, if
British forces were to be deployed in this way.
But even if IS was driven out of the parts of Syria and Iraq
that it now controls, the problem of Islamic terrorism would not go away. It
would rise in another form somewhere else in the world, and the problem of
domestic support for Islamic terror in Britain and other western countries
would remain.
Dropping a lot of bombs on Syria will not be solve our
problems, even if it does allow people to think that ‘something is being done.’
The regional powers who are easily strong enough to deal with IS, need to take
control of any ground operations in Syria and we need to develop our
intelligence domestically as well as internationally to cope with any possible attacks
on the UK.
No comments:
Post a Comment