On Saturday evening after attending the huge demonstration against the government’s austerity agenda in London, I spoke to friend, who is not a political activists, but who is fairly politically aware, who questioned the democratic legitimacy of the march so soon after a general election?
After all, only weeks ago the country endorsed the government’s manifesto, including massive cuts to public expenditure. Is protesting against the government’s mandate to carry out its policies a rejection of the democratic will of the people?
My friend wasn’t the only one to pose this question. David Aaronovitch,
the ex tankie turned neo-con, made the same point via his twitter
account, and even the normally lefty type Sunny
Hundal writing on his Liberal Conspiracy blog says ‘we have to find a better argument than ‘the Tories have no mandate‘
because it sounds ridiculous to anyone outside the hard left.’
The argument Hundal refers to is the line that only 24% of
registered people voted Tory, even though the system delivered them a majority
government. They still did win though, by the rules of our long established electoral
system, and furthermore, if you totalled together the Tory, Lib Dem and UKIP
vote (all pro-austerity parties) it exceeds 50% of the votes cast.
Of course why the Tories won the election is down to a combination
of factors not least that voters were unsure of Labour, who didn’t offer much less than the Tories on the question of cutting public spending anyway.
In Scotland, the SNP won almost all the parliamentary seats
on an anti-austerity platform, and the option of voting Green against austerity
was available in England, but few I suspect thought we would be in a position
of being able to call the shots post election, and they voted tactically for Labour.
There is nothing anti-democratic about protesting against the
government, there are protests most weekends in London, although not as large as
this anti-austerity one, and these things can have an effect of government
policy. The Tories have only a small majority of twelve MPs remember, which
will no doubt get smaller as by-election losses chip away at their numbers.
One aim of the demonstration, not specifically about the
fairness of the public spending cuts, was to bring together different groups,
the unions, political parties, welfare campaigners, housing activists and
environmental groups like the anti-fracking activists. In this it was very
successful, I think. This is movement building, unifying the various opposition
groups under a common banner. Building on the Occupy movement, UK Uncut and Podemos
in Spain, developing a more participatory democracy, and challenging the tired
old status quo of politics in this country and beyond.
Politics and democracy isn’t all about elections and
Westminster anyway, and if our predecessors had not taken a different view we
wouldn’t even have universal suffrage now. There is also a kind of hypocrisy at
work here from (mainly) the right, in that protesting outside of the electoral
parameters of voting every five years is wrong. Like the various right wing ‘think
tanks’, for example the Tax Payers Alliance, who bombard the media with their
agenda of cutting public spending and cutting tax for the wealthy, on an almost
daily basis between elections, is somehow legitimate though.
Saturday’s demonstration lifted my spirits a fair bit,
because it’s good to see there are plenty of others who feel the same way as me
about this Tory government, especially the large Green presence, and are
prepared to mobilise against it.
This will be a long and hard fought campaign, with many
small battles along the way, including some direct action protests and maybe
industrial action too. Saturday was a good start, and I think the high numbers
taking part surprised the media, and we may well have a few more surprises for
them in the coming months.
Perhaps we should implement what the Tories are pushing for with Union votes. The result only counts if a certain percentage of the electorate gets out and votes
ReplyDeleteAs Thomas Jefferson noted, "Democracy presupposes knowledge."
ReplyDeleteSee Expressions that defame us are too often parroted without examination for how Cameron and his Conservative Government have got people to vote for lies..
I believe we should also consider the fact that companies such as American health insurance giant Unum.have been 'advising' successive UK Governments on 'welfare reform' since they were Unum Provident in the early 1990's, despite their having been exposed in the year 2000 as benefit cheats themselves.
Through associating with vulnerable people at Kilburn Unemployed Workers Group meetings, NUJ member and Honorary KUWG membert Kate Belgrave has blog commented, "I personally think that it’s the day to day supporting of people that makes the difference. I like going on marches like [Saturday’s], but that is mainly for the pissups. If everyone who marched yesterday spent two or three days a week accompanying people to jobcentres, challenging government and officials with direct action and always getting in faces – things would soon change."
ReplyDeleteYou must Think Positively about work! Even if work is likely to kill you, etc.