Written by
Gorka Elejabarrieta and first published at Green Left Weekly
Let us be
clear, to defend the unity of the Spanish state is at least as nationalist as
to stand for the independence of Catalonia.
Being
pro-independence does not make you automatically progressive or leftist, but
contrary to what some prominent Left representatives in the Spanish state are
stating, you can be in favour of Catalan independence from a very progressive
perspective.
Moreover, I
believe that the driving forces of the Catalan process are mainly progressive.
As the process has moved forward in recent years, the left in Catalonia has
strengthened while conservative forces have weakened.
Many
unacceptable lies have been told lately in the name of the left in regard to
the Catalan process. When Alberto Garzon took over as leader of the Spanish
state-wide United Left (IU), it seemed to some of us that IU would finally
correct its position towards stateless nations within the Spanish state —
moving to a more democratic approach that respects these nations right to
decide its relations with the Spanish state.
The same can
be said about Podemos. The rise of Podemos (which emerged out of the 2011
indignado anti-austerity movement) and its initial discourses in favour of the
right to decide for Catalonia and the Basque Country became an important change
in the traditional position of the left in Spain towards our nations.
In recent
weeks, Garzon and other representatives of the Spanish left have given some
profound and thoughtful theoretical insights for the left globally to think
about. Among Garzon’s pearls of wisdom, “The left cannot defend the
independence of Catalonia” and “It is not coherent to be a communist and
pro-independence in the Catalan context”.
Spanish nationalism
It is clear
that when he says this it only applies to Catalonia and probably the Basque
Country as well because Garzon and his party don’t have any problem openly
defending the status quo — that is the unity of Spain — while being leftist and
communist. It seems to me that he and his party are much more nationalist —
Spanish nationalist — than they are ready to admit publicly.
From a
progressive stance, this position is hard to understand unless you add to it a
strong dose of Spanish nationalism. From a democratic perspective, this shows
that their support for the “right to decide” is just a valid political position
as long as no nation dares to use it. Or, what is more pernicious, tries to
implement what the majority of the people has decided democratically.
Saying as
many others have said — that the Catalan process is not a valid one because
Spanish laws, specifically the Spanish Constitution, do not allow it — is a not
progressive approach. On the dispute between legality and legitimacy, the left
should always be on the side “of the many, not the few”.
How many
battles would the left, historically, have won if it did not prioritise
legitimacy over existing legality? Suffragist struggles, workers’ organising,
the US civil rights battle, anti-Apartheid movement, national liberation
movements around the globe — every battle that the left has fought over the
past centuries in favour of a better society and for freedoms would not have
been fought if restricted to respecting existing legality.
In Catalonia,
more than 80% of the population supports the right to decide of the Catalan
people. For the past years, there has not been such a huge popular, civic,
peaceful, social, political and cultural process in Europe as the Catalan one.
Hundreds of thousands of citizens have protested once and again.
This process
has brought together the main Catalan institutions, various political parties
from the left and right, the main trade unions, hundreds of social movements,
and small- and medium-sized businesses.
The response
of the Spanish state has been to send state Civil Guards and national police to
attack thousands as they tried to vote, arrest leading figures of the Catalan
social and cultural movements, suspend Catalan autonomy, and jail the Catalan
government, forcing President Carles Puigdemont and four ministers into exile
in Belgium.
As a
consequence, Catalonia is now being directly ruled from Madrid by a party that
has 8% of electoral support in Catalonia.
Choosing sides
When state
repressive apparatuses attack those trying to defend democratic rights for
everybody (including unionists), the left cannot remain neutral. It cannot
position itself between those being attacked and the perpetrators of the attacks.
As human
rights activist Desmond Tutu once said: “If you are neutral in situations of
injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor. If an elephant has its
foot on the tail of a mouse and you say that you are neutral, the mouse will
not appreciate your neutrality.”
Some on the
left say that the consequences Catalonia is facing today are equally the
responsibility of those promoting independence as of the Spanish state. From a
democratic and progressive perspective this position is not acceptable.
Left-wing
British journalist Owen Jones, in a debate in the BBC, said it clearly: “It
doesn’t matter whether you support Catalan independence, it really is quite
irrelevant. The issue is, do you support the right of the Catalan people to
freely determine their own future without being dragged from polling stations
and being thrown downstairs?
“And in
modern Europe, to see... an elected political leadership fleeing a country to
claim political asylum and being locked up in prisons should chill every single
European and encourage us to stand in solidarity with the Catalan people...
“If Scotland
have been denied the right to determine its own future that would have been a
democratic outrage, and... the least that other European governments can do is
tell the Spanish government: Stop assaulting voters, stop locking up elected
politicians, stop denying the rights of your people to determine their own
future and stop attacking civil liberties.”
Some claim
the only way for Catalans to exercise their right to decide is first through a
profound reform to democratise the Spanish state. This is the path that we
Basques have followed for years with no result.
We always
believed that Spain should acknowledge the Basque Country as a political
subject with the right to decide. Only then would Basques be in a position to
freely and democratically determine our own future.
It should be
noted that the right to decide is a democratic right, which would allow every
political project to be defended equally: that of independence, unionism,
autonomy etc. It is a right that at the end of the day would allow every people
to determine its future among the existing possibilities.
This path
proved futile. There is no enough progressive strength within the Spanish state
to democratise it. Not in the past, not now, nor in the near future.
Sortu
secretary-general Arkaitz Rodriguez has repeatedly said to the left across the
Spanish state: “We are willing to cooperate in the democratisation of the
Spanish state with you, but we ask you to be honest and that the day you
realise this to be impossible, that you sum up your forces with the
pro-independence parties to support constituent processes in our nations,
because unlike in the Spanish state, we have enough strength in Catalonia and the
Basque Country to reach independent and progressive republics.”
Path to democracy
The path
towards a more democratic and progressive Europe passes through building free
republics in Catalonia and in the Basque Country. In his day, Karl Marx
understood Irish struggle for independence in a similar way, when he wrote in a
letter to Friedrich Engels: “The English working class will never accomplish
anything before it has got rid of Ireland. The lever must be applied in
Ireland.
“That is why
the Irish question is so important for the social movement in general.”
David
Fernandez, a leader of the pro-independence Catalan left, summed up this
strategy with the simple phrase: If there is not a democratic path towards
independence, then a path towards independence will also bring us democracy.
We are
facing, in my opinion, a two-dimension dilemma in Catalonia. On the one hand,
the Catalan process is a democratic conflict. Catalans should have the right to
determine their own future freely. No law or constitution should prevent
exercising this democratic and legitimate right. Progressive forces in Europe
and around the globe should stand with the Catalans on this.
The
democratic solution to this conflict is clear — a legal and binding referendum
on independence. The problem is that Spain will never accept what seems to everybody
else a logical and democratic solution.
On the other
hand, the Catalan process is a political process. It offers a clear chance to
build a republic that is more progressive and democratic than the status quo.
It is a political process in which the left is increasing its support daily,
and where the status quo is being contested strongly.
Catalonia
will never walk alone, and the left must be by its side —because it is also our
battle.
Gorka Elejabarrieta is head of the
international department of Sortu, a left-wing pro-independence party in the
Basque Country.
it seems clear that the sectarian battlelines have been drawn,which is a pity because instead of asking questions like 'do a majority of citizens of Catalonia favour independence and have they had a reasonable chance to express their views?', we'll just get slogans like the headline of this article.
ReplyDeleteNo, I think the question is, why are they allowed to vote on independence. If that is a slogan, then so be it, but this is the key principle, if you can't see that then you are pro-Spain.
ReplyDeleteI can answer your the questions Don't this us. The majority of Catalans support independence? Yes. We vote in a referèndum and the yes won. Even the referendum wasn't approved by Spain we did it with total garanties and the police biting us. We have a reasonable chance to express our views? No because the mainstream media around the world thinking in other matters that are not catalan has been showing a partial view just depending on their own interests.
ReplyDelete