An interview with Leo Zeilig and first published at ROAPE.net
In an
interview with the socialist writer and activist, John Molyneux, ROAPE’s Leo
Zeilig asks him about climate change, capitalism and socialist transformation.
In an important initiative John has recently founded the Global Ecosocialist Network (GEN)
which brings together activists and researchers from across the Global North
and South. The network hopes to amplify the socialist voice in the struggle
against environmental crisis. Africa, he argues, is crucial to the fight
against climate change.
Can you tell readers of roape.net about yourself? Your background, activism and politics.
I was born in
Britain in 1948 and became a socialist activist and Marxist in 1968 through the
struggle against the Vietnam War, the student revolt and May ’68 in Paris. I
joined the International Socialists in June of that year. I have remained
active ever since. From the mid- seventies onwards I began writing in the field
of Marxist theory, publishing Marxism
and the Party (1978) and What
is the Real Marxist Tradition? (1983) and other books,
pamphlets and articles. Since the late nineties I also started writing about
art and have a book on The
Dialectics of Art coming out later this year.
From 1975 to
2010 I was a teacher at various levels in the city of Portsmouth –
secondary school, further education and then in the School of Art at Portsmouth
University. In 2010 I retired and moved to Dublin where I have continued to be
an activist with People Before Profit and
a writer, publishing books on Anarchism, the media, Marxist philosophy and
Lenin for Today. I have also served as the founder and editor of the Irish Marxist
Review.
Can you
speak a little about your involvement in the climate change movement? As a
long-standing socialist and activist, when did you first become seriously aware
of climate change – what was it that impacted on you explicitly?
I don’t think
there was any single moment. I think probably it was the socialist
writer, Jonathan
Neale, who first fully explained the issue to me somewhere around the
turn of the century. Jonathan served for a period as Secretary of the Campaign to Stop Climate Change and
I was involved in that campaign in a limited way. But I didn’t find that they
were very receptive to my revolutionary socialist ideas.
However, from
quite early on I was convinced that climate change was going to be an
existential crisis for humanity because I was convinced that capitalism was not
going to stop it. There were, of course, debates about this question. Many
people thought there HAD to be a capitalist solution or at least a solution
within capitalism because they thought overthrowing capitalism was out of the
question. Others, including Marxists, engaged in hypothetical debates as to
whether capitalism might, in theory, be able to deal with the issue.
My view was
that regardless of what might theoretically be possible the actually existing
capitalism we were dealing with was not going to stop climate change or even
seriously try to stop it until it was too late. This was because capitalism is
driven by profit and competitive accumulation at every level and because it is
far too heavily invested in fossil fuels to simply switch to renewables. To
those who say we can’t wait for your socialism, we need change NOW, my reply is
I will fight alongside you for change, but I don’t believe we can wait for
capitalism to go green, it’s simply not going to happen. I hope I’m wrong but
so far, I’ve been right.
I always
understood how disastrous climate change was going to be but at first I thought
of it as something fairly far in the future – by the end of the century etc –
and probably outside my life time. But it has become clearer and clearer that
even the IPCCs (the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change) predictions are too conservative and that the
beginnings of climate catastrophe are with us already.
Recently,
specifically last year – with the extraordinary global protests of school
students and many others – the climate emergency has broken onto the world
stage, leaving us all forever changed. Can you discuss how you interpreted this
movement and its significance, and any weaknesses you see?
The school
strikes for climate were unequivocally magnificent and hats off to Greta
Thunberg and everyone else involved. It was wonderful to see young people
stepping forward and on such a global scale. The civil disobedience organised
by Extinction Rebellion,
especially in the first London Rebellion Week, was also a fantastic step
forward. Every socialist should enthusiastically back them and constructively
engage with them. I haven’t much time for leftists who dismiss
radicalising young people because of their lack of ‘the correct programme’ or
base in ‘the organised working class’.
But of course,
these movements, like every emergent mass movement, have weaknesses. In particular
it is a weakness that they tend to think of themselves as ‘beyond’ or ‘above’
politics and therefore often discourage political debate. In my opinion every
aspect of climate change and the environmental crisis is intensely political
and some political forces (largely those on the serious or ‘hard’ left) are
friends of the planet and the climate movement and others (the right and far
right) are its enemies. Without fetishizing the figure of 3.5% [XR thinks that
mobilising 3.5% of the population is necessary to secure ‘system change’]
I think XR’s aim to mobilize those sort of mass numbers is excellent but I’m
not sure that all their methods of organising are conducive to achieving this.
You have
just initiated the Global
Ecosocialist Network (GEN) bringing together activists and researchers
from across the Global North and South. Can you explain what you hope to
achieve?
The developing
climate emergency has generated much increased public awareness of climate
change and the environment generally and a new wave of activism which many
socialists are part of and engaging positively with. However, the current
environmental discourse – internationally – both in terms of the media and most
of the public is dominated by what could be called ‘green liberalism’. A more
radical version of green liberalism is also prevalent among activists along
with a vague ‘deep green’ consciousness. This goes together with an
understanding of system change as essentially a change in collective mind set
which lends itself to illusions in the possibility of converting corporations
and mainstream politicians and the State.
At the moment
the socialist voice in the movement is very limited, certainly not dominant.
But the socialist voice is essential because capitalism is not going resolve
either the climate change issue or the wider environmental crisis. Socialist
transformation of society is objectively necessary. Moreover a socialist
approach is crucial to winning over and mobilizing the mass of working class
people. Unfortunately, in this extremely urgent situation much of the
international revolutionary left is very weak.
Our network is
an attempt in a small way to improve this situation, to amplify the socialist
voice and reach out to new forces. Its initial aim is to bring ecosocialists
together to facilitate the exchange and propagation of socialist
environmentalist ideas along with reports on the development of the crisis and
resistance from around the world. Later it may be able to hold conferences and
issue calls for action.
Marx’s
‘ecological writings’ have been fairly recently written about by writers like
John Bellamy Foster, and others. Can you explain why a structural challenge to
capitalism is essential, and how Marxism can help in this challenge?
First, I think
we should acknowledge the enormously important intellectual work done by John Bellamy Foster and
his collaborators such as Paul Burkett and Ian Angus. There was a widespread
interpretation, including among Marxists, of Marx as ‘productionist’ and a
‘super industrialiser’ and therefore anti-environmentalist. They demolished
this myth. Speaking personally I owe a considerable debt to John Bellamy Foster
for his book Marx’s
Ecology. When I read it after more than 30 years as a Marxist it
substantially transformed and deepened my understanding of Marxism. The concept
of the ‘metabolic rift’ is hugely important. I’m very proud that he is a
sponsor of GEN. Ian Angus’s Facing
the Anthropocene – he’s another sponsor – is also brilliant.
I have already
explained above the essential reason why we need a structural challenge to
capitalism but this applies at every level. Production for profit is inherently
destructive of nature whether we are talking about the dumping of toxic waste
round the corner from where I live, to the plastic choking the oceans, to the
deadly pollution of the air – all the way to the overarching challenge of
climate change.
What is more
capitalism will ensure that the response to climate disasters which it is
generating will be callous, cruel, class based and racist. This has been
demonstrated time and again from Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans to Hurricane
Maria in Puerto Rico to the fires in Australia. We need to challenge capitalist
priorities, structures and the system as a whole, not only to stop
environmental degradation and catastrophic climate change but also to deal with
its effects.
ROAPE, a
radical review and website on political economy, focuses on Africa.
Unfortunately, we have not covered the climate emergency in enough detail
recently. The mobilisations last year were weak across the continent, as
inspiring as they were. What role does Africa have to play in the struggle
against climate change and how do you see the Global Ecosocialist Network
helping?
Africa is
absolutely crucial to the struggle against climate change. In terms of
immediate effects Africa will almost certainly be the worst hit part of the
world. The drought in Southern and Eastern Africa is already truly deadly and
the extent of poverty in Africa will magnify the consequences of every climate
disaster and extreme weather event. That this comes on top of the fact that
Africa, as a whole, has the lowest per capita carbon footprint of any continent
makes Africa the litmus test of any verbal commitment to climate justice.
Moreover the
racist hierarchy of death in the world will ensure that hundreds or thousands
of lives lost in central or eastern Africa will be less reported and count for
less in terms of
Western consciousness than five or ten lives lost in California or Australia.
Western consciousness than five or ten lives lost in California or Australia.
Mass
mobilizations in Africa linked to demands for climate justice would be the best
possible antidote to this state of affairs.
It is therefore
a key task of the Global Ecosocialist Network to do what it can to rectify the
disgraceful neglect of the situation in Africa and to stimulate radical
resistance in the African continent.
We are very
pleased that Africa is well represented among our initial sponsors and we have
already published an excellent article on the terrible
situation in Southern and Eastern Africa by Rehad Desai, the South
African radical film maker, who is also a member of the Network’s Interim
Steering Committee.
What are the
immediate tasks for the network, and how do we expand it?
The most
immediate task is to expand the readership of the website and the membership of
the Network both through individuals joining and organisations affiliating. For
this we need our existing members and supporters to actively promote GEN and
recruit to it. Here it is important to stress that joining GEN is ‘commitment
light’: it does not entail any major obligations in terms of activity, nor does
it impinge on any individual’s or organisation’s existing political practice.
If in the next
period we can gain enough members and resources – we have no external funding
whatsoever – we can move to the next stage of convening some kind of
international meeting or conference. Hopefully this would enable us to put the
Network on a sounder democratic footing than it has at present – obviously
doing this on a global basis presents certain problems e.g. anywhere such
a meeting is convened, be it Rio or Paris, Cape Town, Lagos, Mumbai or Sydney,
will be much harder for some comrades to reach than others. Possibly down the line
we can develop multiple regional foci or centres. The holding of the Cop
26 Conference in Glasgow in November may also serve as a focus for
us.
John
Molyneux is a socialist, writer and activist and editor of Irish Marxist
Review. John is also a founder of the Global
Ecosocialist Network.
No comments:
Post a Comment