British Gas announced today that it
will be increasing its electricity prices to customers by a whopping 12.5%
overall, in September this year. The rise comes despite Centrica, who own British Gas, reporting
underlying operating profits of £816m for the six months to 30 June.
Admittedly, this is a fall of 4% on the previous six months, but as even
Centrica concedes, this is due to unusually warm weather in the UK this year.
Centrica
also said that wholesale energy costs had gone down and were not the reason for
the price rise. Centrica chief executive Iain Conn told the BBC:
"We
have seen our wholesale costs fall by about £36 on the typical bill since the
beginning of 2014 and that is not the driver. It is transmission and
distribution of electricity to the home and government policy costs that are
driving our price increase."
Conn, was
handed a pay rise of nearly 40% last year, taking his remuneration package to
£4.15m according to the
Guardian.
A government
spokesperson countered the claims by Centrica by saying:
"Government
policy costs make up a relatively small proportion of household energy bills
and cannot explain these price rises."
For once, I
believe the government and Centrica are just talking bullshit.
British Gas
is the biggest of the ‘Big Six’ energy providers in the UK. The other five are
EDF Energy, npower, E.ON UK, Scottish Power and SSE. And here we have the problem
in a nut shell, these six companies supply gas and electricity to over 50
million homes in the UK, which equates to over 90% of domestic energy supply.
It is likely that the other ‘Big Six’ will now follow suit with prices rises,
because, well they are a cartel, and can pretty much do as they please.
Inflation is
now running at 2.9% and with wages stagnant or even falling in many cases, this
price rise is likely to exacerbate fuel poverty in the UK. At the end of 2016
there were more than 2.3
million people living in fuel poverty in the UK.
So what is
to be done? Well, the government is muttering about reviving the idea of energy
price caps, which they did promise in their election manifesto less than two
months ago, but have now shelved. I doubt it will happen.
As usual at
a time when this type of news breaks, people are blamed for being on the wrong tariffs,
which may be true, but with hundreds of these tariffs on offer you need to be
quite savvy to get this right. Maybe the government should abolish multi tariffed selling? But they won’t do that either. It goes against their worship of the concept of
‘choice.’
There are
calls being made for introducing more providers into the market, which might to
some extent help, although we would still be looking at a profit motive, and to break such a cartel as exists in UK energy supply is no
easy thing to do, and certainly not quickly.
But there is
another way, again it would take a little time but have huge benefits, beyond
busting the UK energy cartel. Promoted by organisations like Greenpeace, Local
Energy Networks, could be the solution to not only fair pricing but also
climate change and democratising energy supply.
Centralised energy
production is hugely wasteful, with something like two thirds of all the energy
produced wasted in transmission, from power station to homes. The loss is through the cables, and the longer the cables the more energy is lost. Also, the amount
of heat thrown away, in for example cooling towers, is equivalent to all the
heating and hot water needs in the UK's buildings. Ironically ‘transmission
costs’ were something British Gas blamed today for the price hike.
By contrast,
in a decentralised energy system, electricity is generated close to where it is
needed, so that the heat, which would otherwise be wasted, can be used in the
surrounding homes, offices and factories.
Decentralising
our energy system allows that 'waste' heat to be used. This better alternative
can slash energy wastage, radically cut CO2 and ensure we get maximum energy
from our fuel, giving us improved energy security.
Decentralised
energy is already delivering results in other countries. The entire city of
Rotterdam, for example, runs on decentralised energy.
Local Energy
Networks also have revolutionary ecosocialist potential. They can be owned by
community cooperatives, rather than corporations. We could potentially push the big, inefficient
and downright greedy corporations right out of our lives.
What is not
to like?
No comments:
Post a Comment