In almost every
metric to measure extreme weather, the Earth is breaking record after record,
from the hottest heat waves to the worst fires to one of the most active
hurricane seasons on record. This is the new normal and yes, this is
climate change.
Millions have
been evacuated, and hundreds of thousands have lost their homes to fires and
flooding since COVID-19, a pandemic that itself foreshadows the dangers of
unfettered environmental degradation. Across the West Coast, under menacing
orange skies, people have been forced indoors to avoid toxic smoke from
historic fires in the middle of a respiratory pandemic.
The fires and
smoke have created a dramatic sense of fear and dread among a huge section of
the population not just in California, but in Washington State and Oregon as
well. While millions, especially young people, see the need for immediate,
dramatic action, there is also an overwhelming sense of fear that we’re out of
time.
The two main
political parties in the U.S. stand squarely in the way of the seismic change
that is necessary. The only way out of this crisis is if we do it ourselves,
and involve millions in the process of democratically planning and building an
environmentally sustainable, socialist society.
Extreme
Weather Unchecked
As global
temperatures rise, dry climates become drier, creating more fuel for fires out
of scorched fields, forests, and debris. Warmer weather also means that in
wetter climates, the air can hold more moisture, meaning that tropical storms
and hurricanes come with more threat of flooding. Even if we went 100% carbon
neutral tomorrow, extreme weather would continue. While we need to stop this
crisis at its source, we also need to adapt to a new climate norm.
One piece of
this is ramping up and fixing our broken forest management and wildfire
response. Wildfires are natural in places like California, but an
“if-it-burns-extinguish-it” approach for decades has prevented fires that would
have cleared debris now being gobbled up by megafires.
Combine this
with decades of underfunding, reliance on prison labor to fight fires (who were
in short supply because of COVID-19 outbreaks), and you have California
desperately appealing to other states and even Australia to send firefighters.
We need full funding for wildfire response and forest management – including
controlled burns.
While we need
adequate resources to respond to climate threats, we also need to reconsider
where we can live and work. If carbon emissions continue as they are, in 30
years half a million homes will flood each year. By 2070, 28
million people will be impacted by Manhattan-sized megafires.
And yet, since
2010 in coastal states, the most flood-prone areas have seen the highest
rates of home construction, and development is continuing in areas hit
by wildfires on the West Coast.
Developers have
continuously pushed back against building codes that would require things like
fire and impact proof windows, which often make the difference between a home
sustaining some damage or being completely leveled.
Meanwhile, the
insurance industry is playing a disappearing act. Last year, California
officials had to ban insurers from cancelling policies for 800,000
homes. Hundreds of thousands are being dropped by their insurance companies
because insurance is just not profitable when a house burns down or
floods.
People don’t
need for-profit insurance – we should be ensuring all people have affordable
high-quality housing with the promise of relief in the case of any natural
disaster. This would include fire proof windows and metal roofs in fire-prone
areas, and high-quality metal shutters and hurricane straps to secure walls to
rafters in coastal areas. The insurance industry is a shoddy substitute for
social services.
Instead, we
need a massive jobs program that could put millions back to work in
high-quality union jobs building affordable, sustainable housing and
retrofitting homes to withstand extreme weather funded by taxing the rich.
No Time to
Wait
The Republican
Party and Donald Trump are obvious threats to the environment, but the criminal
negligence of the Democratic Party that controls California, Oregon, and
Washington is life-threatening too. With one hand, California Governor Gavin
Newsom mandates cars be fossil-fuel free by 2035.
With the other, he
has approved 36 new fracking permits since COVID-19 began. In July, he cut pay
for firefighters by 7.5%. In May, budget cuts from his emergency pandemic
budget meant CalFire added just 167 firefighters to its ranks, instead of the
500 they requested, which is itself far short of what they need.
Newsom also
opposes raising taxes on the wealthiest in the state – so where, then, is the
money for wildfire response supposed to come from?
Joe Biden has a
far-reaching climate plan compared to those of Democrats past, but it still
falls wildly short of what is necessary, and he still doesn’t support a Green
New Deal. To win even his modest measures, Biden and the Democrats would need
to directly take on the fossil fuel industry, developers, and major polluting
industries, which they continually refuse to do.
Just 100 fossil
fuel producers are responsible for 70% of emissions from the last two decades –
is it any wonder they promote individual lifestyle change as a solution? The
billionaires that have run our planet into the ground have known about climate
change for decades, and they know it’s getting worse.
As long as our
society is run on the basis of profit, we will have to battle moneyed interests
every single step of the way to win the most modest changes. And as long as our
two political parties are both beholden to these corporate interests, we’ll
have to fight them too.
We don’t have
time to let them slow us down anymore: to avoid full-scale climate meltdown, we
have to completely do away with the system of capitalism. Private utilities and
fossil fuel companies should be taken into democratic public ownership.
We need to
build on the youth climate movement that has brought millions into the street
to fight for our futures. To win, we will need a mass, revolutionary movement
of the working class, the class that can bring society to a grinding halt and
build it up from the ground again, on a sustainable basis.
We demand:
- Develop controlled burning practices as part of forest management, consulting indigenous communities who have used this practice for centuries.
- Workers should have the right to refuse non-essential work in areas with poor air quality!
- Bring private utilities and major fossil fuel companies into democratic, public ownership. They should be immediately retooled for renewable energy sources.
- A new political party that rejects fossil fuel money, and builds movements to fight for a Green New Deal and dramatic climate action NOW!
- System change not climate change:
the system of capitalism will continue exploiting the planet in the
interest of profit. It also relies on the exploitation of the working
class and particularly oppressed groups, who disproportionately suffer
from the effects of climate change. To save our planet, and to rid our
society of racism, sexism, homophobia, and all forms of oppression, we
have to fight for the socialist transformation of society, and rebuild on
an equitable, sustainable basis for all!
All the Green New Deals I've seen so far have been little more than excuses for continuing industrial capitalism with a green gloss, yet that's the system which has led to this crisis in the first place. If even the Green Left blog doesn't recognise the historical depth of the causes of climate change, I'm in despair. Socialism is necessary but not sufficient if it merely transfers extractivism to worker co-ops.
ReplyDeleteA pertinent example is Bolivia 2019. Evo Morales was ousted, in part, because he refused to allow a corporation to take the benefits from the country's potentially huge reserves of lithium which, as we know, is vital for those batteries which green technophiles tell us will save the world. But, whether Bolivian lithium mines are publicly- or privately-owned, they're still mines with all the pollution, fossil fuel use, greenhouse gas emissions and social destruction that are their inevitable consequences. Any Green New Deal seems to blithely gloss over the costs to people and the planet of renewable energy and continuing with economic growth.
I share some of your scepticism for GND, but I do see as moving it in the just transition direction, not a end in itself, but part of the transition. Some versions are better than others, of course.
ReplyDeleteAnother thought: "we need a massive jobs program that could put millions back to work in high-quality union jobs building affordable, sustainable housing...". Is there, in the UK, a huge reservoir of millions of unemployed, fit, relatively young people able and willing to spend their working lives in jobs that are physically hard, involve a lot of work outside in all weathers and which are not highly esteemed? So, who is going to build and retrofit all those houses?
ReplyDeleteAnd where will the materials come from to supply this programme? Why, from mines. There's nowhere else. Mines are probably the least green industry I can think of, yet all Green New Deals involve huge expansion of the mining industry which is rubbing its hands in glee at the thought. To realise just how ungreen any GND is, see https://www.mining.com/minings-unlikely-heroines-greta-thunberg-and-aoc/
very nice blog.
ReplyDelete